Skip to main content

Public Housing Subsidies: Revisions to HUD's Performance Funding System Could Improve Adequacy of Funding

RCED-98-174 Published: Jun 19, 1998. Publicly Released: Jun 19, 1998.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Performance Funding System (PFS) for allocating appropriated funds to housing agencies as operating subsidies, focusing on: (1) how PFS allocates the congressionally appropriated subsidy among public housing agencies; (2) whether PFS meets the subsidy needs of individual housing agencies; (3) how HUD's budget estimates of housing agencies' annual need for operating subsidies are developed and whether the estimates are appropriate; and (4) some of the possible options that HUD might have for changing PFS to make it a more effective tool for subsidizing housing agencies.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Housing and Urban Development As HUD considers its various options for redesigning the PFS, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development should also consider establishing a process that: (1) allows housing agencies to appeal their expense levels when they believe that significant changes have occurred over time in their operating circumstances that cause their subsidy to be inappropriate; and (2) HUD can use to review housing agencies' expense levels that it believes may be excessive.
Closed – Not Implemented
This recommendation is now 7 years old and still not implemented. Events relating to the funding of public housing have moved beyond this recommendation. Therefore, the recommendation is being closed as not implemented.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Cost analysisFunds managementHousing programsLow income housingPublic housingSubsidiesGovernment subsidiesHousingExpenditure of fundsInflation