Skip to HighlightsSkip to Recommendations
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed recent management changes and program delays in the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP).
Recommendations for Executive Action
|National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program Joint Chairs Council||1. To ensure that Congress is provided with the best information available concerning the economic effects of acidic deposition, the Chairman of the NAPAP Joint Chairs Council (JCC) should identify economic information needed to assess the acidic deposition issue and ensure that the associated analyses be undertaken. This effort should include: (1) the review and coordination of the economic effects assessment work currently conducted by federal agencies and organizations outside of NAPAP; and (2) the identification of gaps that remain to be addressed to meet NAPAP goals in such work.|
|National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program Joint Chairs Council||2. To ensure that key NAPAP documents are issued on a timely basis in the future, the Joint Chairs Council should: (1) direct the Director of Research and NAPAP task group officials to give high priority to the development of assessment documents, annual reports, and operating research plans; and (2) examine the staffing situation in the Office of the Director of Research and determine where delays occur and take steps to eliminate the bottlenecks.|
|National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program Joint Chairs Council||3. The Joint Chairs Council should determine whether the establishment of an external scientific committee would benefit NAPAP and, if such a committee would be beneficial, direct the Director of Research to establish it.|