The Davis-Bacon Act requires that each contract for the construction, alteration, or repair of public buildings in excess of $2,000, to which the United States is a party or shares the financing, must state the minimum wages to be paid to various classes of laborers and mechanics. The minimum wages are those determined by the Secretary of Labor to be prevailing for laborers employed on projects of a similar character in the area in which the work is to be performed. The act was intended to discourage nonlocal contractors from successfully bidding on government projects by hiring cheap labor from outside the project area, thus disrupting the prevailing local wage structure. In 1977, about $172.5 billion was spent on new public and private construction projects, but only $37.8 billion was for direct federal or federally assisted construction spent by state and local agencies, involving about 22 percent of the nation's 3.8 million construction workers. The remaining $134.7 billion was for privately financed projects without the prevailing wage protection of the Davis-Bacon Act.
Matter for Congressional Consideration
|Congress should repeal the Davis-Bacon Act and rescind the weekly payroll reporting requirement of the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act because of: (1) significant increased costs to the federal government; (2) the impact of excessive wage determination rates on inflating construction costs and disturbing local wage scales; and (3) the fact that contractors tend to pay prevailing rates, which is the intent of the act, when determinations are too low.||This recommendation should be closed because it is highly unlikely that Congress will take action on it.|
|Congress should also repeal the provisions in the 77 related statutes which involve federally assisted construction projects and require that wages paid to contractor employees should not be less than those determined by the Secretary of Labor to be prevailing in the locality in accordance with, or pursuant to, the Davis-Bacon Act.||This recommendation should be closed because it is highly unlikely that Congress will take action on it.|