Medicaid: CMS Should Assess Effect of Increased Telehealth Use on Beneficiaries' Quality of Care
Telehealth has helped people get the health care they need while reducing their COVID-19 exposure risk. At the start of the pandemic, Medicaid data from 5 states showed exponential increases in
- the number and percentage of services delivered via telehealth
- the number of Medicaid beneficiaries receiving telehealth
For example, from March 2020-February 2021, 32.5 million services were delivered via telehealth vs. 2.1 million services the prior year.
But, Medicaid hasn't collected or assessed data on the quality of care beneficiaries received from telehealth services. We recommended doing so.
What GAO Found
GAO's analysis of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data in five selected states shows that the number and percentage of services delivered via telehealth and Medicaid beneficiaries receiving them increased exponentially at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. From March 2020 through February 2021, 32.5 million services were delivered via telehealth to about 4.9 million beneficiaries in the five states, compared with 2.1 million services to about 455,000 beneficiaries in the 12 months prior to the pandemic.
Percentage of Medicaid Beneficiaries Receiving at Least One of Their Services via Telehealth, March 2019 through February 2020 and March 2020 through February 2021
Note: GAO determined Tennessee's data were not sufficiently reliable for purposes of this analysis.
Medicaid officials from all six selected states said expanding telehealth supported beneficiaries' access to care, but also identified some limitations. Officials reported making or considering post-pandemic telehealth modifications.
CMS does not collect, assess, or report information about any effect delivering services via telehealth has on the quality of care Medicaid beneficiaries receive and has no plans to do so. Doing so is important, given concerns GAO has raised about the quality of care provided via telehealth. It would also be consistent with how CMS has encouraged states to use data on quality of care to identify disparities in health care and target opportunities for improvement to advance health equity. These efforts could begin with data for quality measures CMS already collects or through other means.
CMS neither agreed nor disagreed with GAO's recommendations. GAO maintains it is crucial for CMS to collect and analyze information to assess telehealth's effect on the quality of care Medicaid beneficiaries receive.
Why GAO Did This Study
To respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, states have expanded their coverage of telehealth in Medicaid, a jointly financed federal-state health care program for low-income and medically needy individuals.
The CARES Act includes a provision for GAO to report on the federal response to the pandemic. In addition, GAO was asked to examine the use of Medicaid flexibilities in response to COVID-19. This report describes selected states' telehealth use before and during the pandemic, and experiences with and plans for telehealth. It also evaluates, among other things, CMS's telehealth oversight of quality of services.
GAO analyzed state-reported data on telehealth use in six states selected, in part, based on variation in geography, Medicaid program size, and percentage of population living in rural areas. GAO reviewed federal oversight documents, interviewed state and federal Medicaid officials, and assessed CMS oversight against CMS guidance on using data to identify disparities in health care and target improvements.
GAO is making two recommendations to CMS to (1) collect and analyze information about the effect delivering services via telehealth has on the quality of care Medicaid beneficiaries receive, and (2) determine any next steps based on the results of the analysis.
Recommendations for Executive Action
|Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services||The Administrator of CMS should collect and analyze the information needed to assess the effect delivering services via telehealth has on the quality of care Medicaid beneficiaries receive. (Recommendation 1)||
In October 2022, CMS said information is not available to carry out an assessment and reiterated the agency does not have the authority to modify the specifications of Core Sets' measures for which it is not the measurement steward. As we noted in our report, this is not the only approach that CMS could take. In particular, CMS could develop a plan for reporting a measure for which it is the steward; for example, reporting on any effect that service delivery (for example, in-person or via telehealth) has on the quality of care Medicaid beneficiaries receive. Additionally, where CMS is not the measure steward, CMS could assess the feasibility of alternatives to current reporting of these measures. GAO maintains it is crucial for CMS to collect and analyze information to assess telehealth's effect on the quality of care Medicaid beneficiaries receive, through the Core Sets or through other means.
|Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services||The Administrator of CMS should determine, based on the results of its initial assessment, whether further assessments of the effect delivering services via telehealth has on the quality of care Medicaid beneficiaries receive are warranted, for the purposes of developing guidance to assist states in making telehealth coverage and payment decisions. (Recommendation 2)||
In October 2022, CMS said information is not available to carry out the initial assessment on which to determine the need for additional guidance. As noted in our report, we identified efforts in four of six selected states to assess the quality of care provided via telehealth. These state-based efforts may merit further agency investigation. GAO maintains it is crucial for CMS to collect and analyze information to assess the effect that delivering services via telehealth has on the quality of care Medicaid beneficiaries receive. Additionally, the results of these initial assessments should inform whether further assessments are warranted, including whether to develop guidance to assist states in making telehealth coverage and payment decisions.