Alaska Native Issues: Federal Agencies Could Enhance Support for Native Village Efforts to Address Environmental Threats
Fast Facts
Erosion, flooding, and thawing permafrost can threaten lives and damage infrastructure in Alaska Native villages. Climate change is expected to exacerbate these threats.
Federal agencies budgeted about $200 million in FYs 2016-2020 to build resilience to environmental threats in these villages, but much more needs to be done to protect them. Of the more than 30 federal programs that could help, most are hard for Native villages to access. For example, programs that require participants to share costs with the government can be out of reach for small villages.
Our recommendations address program access and other issues we found.
Erosion and thawing permafrost undermine the land beneath homes in Newtok, Alaska
Highlights
What GAO Found
More than 70 out of over 200 Alaska Native villages face significant environmental threats from erosion, flooding, or thawing permafrost, according to a 2019 statewide assessment. Consequences from even a moderate flood or increasing erosion could be significant (see fig.), and over one-third of these communities face the compounding effects of more than one threat. According to several federal officials, short-term actions are needed to address the most urgent threats without waiting for additional studies. At the same time, many Native villages also need more information to support longer-term planning.
Erosion-Damaged Road in the Native Village of Shishmaref
Federal agencies provided a total of about $391 million in obligations in fiscal years 2016 through 2020 to (1) repair damaged infrastructure in Alaska Native villages; and (2) build their resilience to environmental threats, including by implementing protection measures. However, since more than one-third of highly threatened Native villages did not receive such federal assistance during these 5 years, significant work remains to protect these communities.
Opportunities exist for federal agencies to better support Alaska Native village efforts to build resilience to environmental threats by improving coordination among federal, state, and tribal entities. Federal agencies coordinate in several targeted ways, including on a per-project basis, but do not systematically coordinate to address these threats statewide. Broader coordination efforts have been limited because of agencies' focus on their own projects and the absence of consistent federal support for interagency coordination. Establishing an interagency and intergovernmental coordinating entity could facilitate more strategically targeted federal investments that more effectively address the threats facing Alaska Native villages.
Further, GAO reviewed 20 programs across federal agencies and found they each had at least one characteristic that could pose an obstacle to villages' obtaining assistance, such as project cost-share requirements. Implementing changes to address those obstacles that are established in agency regulations or policy, where feasible and appropriate, could help Native villages better obtain federal assistance.
Why GAO Did This Study
Erosion, flooding, and thawing permafrost can pose environmental threats to lives and infrastructure in Alaska Native villages. According to the United States Global Change Research Program, climate change is expected to exacerbate these threats. GAO identified 10 federal agencies that administer programs that support Alaska Native village efforts to address and build resilience to environmental threats.
GAO was asked to review federal efforts to help Alaska Native villages address environmental threats. This report examines (1) information about environmental threats to Native villages; (2) federal funding provided to address such threats, and actions supported by that funding; and (3) opportunities to better support efforts to build resilience to such threats.
GAO analyzed federal risk information and obligations data from 10 federal agencies for fiscal years 2016 through 2020; reviewed agency documents and other relevant reports; and interviewed agency officials and representatives from selected Alaska Native villages and tribal organizations.
Recommendations
Congress should consider establishing a coordinating entity to assist Native villages facing environmental threats. GAO is also making eight recommendations, including that seven agencies change programs to reduce barriers that hinder Native villages' accessing federal assistance. Six of these agencies agreed with GAO's recommendations, and the seventh agency stated it agreed with the report's findings.
Matter for Congressional Consideration
| Matter | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Congress should consider establishing an interagency and intergovernmental coordinating entity and requiring the relevant agencies to participate and engage in sustained coordination to strategically target federal investments to Alaska Native villages facing significant environmental threats. Congress should also consider directing the coordinating entity and its participating agencies to identify opportunities to streamline program delivery across federal agencies; assess the statutory program characteristics we identified that pose obstacles to Alaska Native villages' obtaining assistance, and identify any others; and submit a report to Congress with any recommendations for statutory changes to streamline program delivery and to address such obstacles. (Matter for Consideration 1) | As of February 3, 2025, Congress has not acted on this matter. |
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Bureau of Indian Affairs | The BIA Director should identify options for providing additional technical assistance that is specifically designed to help Alaska Native villages navigate and obtain assistance from the variety of potentially available federal programs, including by assessing how BIA prioritizes its available resources. (Recommendation 1) |
As of October 2024, BIA had several ongoing actions to provide additional technical assistance to help Alaska Native villages obtain assistance from federal programs. BIA has hired additional staff who provide direct technical assistance to Alaska Native villages participating in BIA's Voluntary Community Driven Relocation Program. In addition, BIA provided a 10-month training series to Tribes that received funding for relocation, managed retreat, or protect-in-place coordinators through the Tribal Climate Resilience Program. We will continue to monitor BIA's actions in response to this recommendation, including whether they are sustained over time.
|
| The Denali Commission | The Denali Commission's Federal Co-chair should identify options for providing additional technical assistance that is specifically designed to help Alaska Native villages navigate and obtain assistance from the variety of potentially available federal programs, including by assessing how the Commission prioritizes its available resources. (Recommendation 2) | The Denali Commission has continued to provide funding in fiscal years 2022 and 2023 for technical assistance to help Alaska Native villages obtain assistance from federal programs. Denali Commission officials said that the Commission plans to continue providing support for technical assistance but did not indicate if the amounts will increase over time. Further, officials stated that they believe other agencies administering programs in Alaska should contribute to technical assistance for Alaska Native villages and that the Commission has other needs to address in Alaska beyond providing technical assistance. We will continue to monitor the Commission's actions in response to this...
|
| Bureau of Indian Affairs | The BIA Director should review BIA's programs identified in this report and, where the agency determines it feasible and appropriate, implement relevant changes to address program characteristics that are not established in statute that pose obstacles to Alaska Native villages' obtaining assistance, including characteristics we identified and others that BIA may identify. BIA should also document its review, any related consultation with tribes, and any changes made to its programs. (Recommendation 3) | As of July 2024, BIA has reviewed the Tribal Climate Resilience Program (TCRP) and implemented changes to address the obstacles to Alaska Native villages obtaining assistance that we identified. Although TCRP is still a competitive grant program-which we reported as an obstacle in our report-BIA has taken steps to help Alaska Native villages access the program. For fiscal year 2024, BIA streamlined the program's request for proposals, including decreasing the number of funding categories and including a succinct list of proposal requirements for each category. In 2023, BIA provided a grant-writing workshop for the program, which is also available online. In addition, the program includes...
|
| Department of Defense | The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works should direct the Chief of Engineers and the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to review the Corps' programs identified in this report and, where the agency determines it feasible and appropriate, implement relevant changes to address program characteristics that are not established in statute that pose obstacles to Alaska Native villages' obtaining assistance, including characteristics we identified and others that the Corps may identify. The Corps should also document its review, any related consultation with tribes, and any changes made to its programs. (Recommendation 4) | As of October 2024, the Corps has implemented some changes to the seven programs we reviewed to reduce obstacles to Alaska Native villages obtaining assistance and described other ongoing and planned actions. For example, in February 2024, the Corps issued a proposed rule establishing Agency Specific Procedures for the Corps' implementation of the Principles, Requirements, and Guidelines for water resources investments. According to Corps officials, this rule, if finalized, would significantly affect how it considers cost-benefit ratios for water resources investments, including for programs we reviewed. In addition, the Corps conducted listening sessions for Tribes, solicited input on...
|
| Federal Emergency Management Agency | The Administrator of FEMA should review FEMA's programs identified in this report and, where the agency determines it feasible and appropriate, implement relevant changes to address program characteristics that are not established in statute that pose obstacles to Alaska Native villages' obtaining assistance, including characteristics we identified and others that FEMA may identify. FEMA should also document its review, any related consultation with tribes, and any changes made to its programs. (Recommendation 5) | As of February 2025, FEMA has taken some actions that could help reduce the obstacles associated with the four programs we reviewed in our report. For example, FEMA has taken some actions that could help Alaska Native villages access competitive grants, including providing set-aside funds, technical assistance, grant writing support, and training. Specifically, in fiscal year 2022 FEMA increased the amount of funding available for the BRIC tribal set-aside from $25 million to $50 million. However, FEMA has not documented its review of all four programs and the obstacles identified in our report. For example, FEMA has not provided information on its review of the obstacles to the Flood...
|
| Department of Housing and Urban Development | The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development should direct the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Native American Programs and the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development to review HUD's programs identified in this report and, where the agency determines it feasible and appropriate, implement relevant changes to address program characteristics that are not established in statute that pose obstacles to Alaska Native villages' obtaining assistance, including characteristics we identified and others that HUD may identify. HUD should also document its review, any related consultation with tribes, and any changes made to its programs. (Recommendation 6) | As of October 2024, HUD ONAP has taken steps toward updating regulations for its Indian Community Development Block Grant Program, which include ICDBG-Imminent Threat grants requirements. HUD issued a Dear Tribal Leader Letter announcing HUD's plans to start the rulemaking process in 2023 and held 10 formal consultation sessions with Tribes in 2023 and 2024. According to HUD officials, one potential outcome of the new rulemaking could be to address the fact that recurring events are explicitly ineligible for ICDBG-Imminent Threat grants. HUD plans to complete action to address this recommendation by June 2025. We will continue to monitor HUD's actions in response to this recommendation...
|
| National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | The Administrator of NOAA should review NOAA's programs identified in this report and, where the agency determines it feasible and appropriate, implement relevant changes to address program characteristics that are not established in statute that pose obstacles to Alaska Native villages' obtaining assistance, including characteristics we identified and others that NOAA may identify. NOAA should also document its review, any related consultation with tribes, and any changes made to its programs. (Recommendation 7) | As of December 2024, NOAA reviewed the National Coastal Resilience Fund (NCRF) and implemented changes to address obstacles to Alaska Native villages obtaining assistance. NOAA concluded that the primary barrier to Alaska Native villages accessing the program is the scope and intent of NCRF. Although NOAA did not make changes to NCRF to address this barrier directly, it provided funding through another program-the Climate Resilience Regional Challenge. Specifically, NOAA provided approximately $75 million in 2024 to support technical assistance for Alaska Native villages. NOAA also updated its guidance for NCRF to clarify that a nonfederal cost share is not required for program...
|
| Natural Resources Conservation Service | The Chief of NRCS should review NRCS's programs identified in this report and, where the agency determines it feasible and appropriate, implement relevant changes to address program characteristics that are not established in statute that pose obstacles to Alaska Native villages' obtaining assistance, including characteristics we identified and others that NRCS may identify. NRCS should also document its review, any related consultation with tribes, and any changes made to its programs. (Recommendation 8) | As of December 2024, USDA has implemented a change to its Emergency Watershed Protection Program and Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Program to reduce obstacles to Alaska Native villages obtaining assistance and described other planned actions. Specifically, in August 2024, USDA issued a final rule that addressed a barrier NRCS identified by eliminating the requirement for Tribes and tribal organizations to have eminent domain authority to sponsor watershed projects. According to NRCS, this change will better enable Alaska Native villages to receive funding through its watershed programs for infrastructure and recovery projects. In December 2022, USDA also stated that NRCS...
|