Skip to main content

Electronic Health Records: Fiscal Year 2013 Expenditure Plan Lacks Key Information Needed to Inform Future Funding Decisions

GAO-14-609 Published: Jul 08, 2014. Publicly Released: Jul 08, 2014.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

The Departments of Veterans Affairs' (VA) and Defense's (DOD) fiscal year 2013 integrated Electronic Health Record (iEHR) expenditure plan satisfied one and partially satisfied five of the six statutory conditions specified in the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013. Specifically, the plan

Satisfied the condition to relay detailed cost-sharing business rules by including a memorandum of agreement between the two departments that outlined cost-sharing provisions and principles within the VA/DOD Interagency Program Office (IPO).

  • Partially satisfied the condition to define the budget and cost baseline for the development of the iEHR program by including the budget and cost baseline from fiscal years 2012 through 2018 for each department. However, the baseline, as reported, was not based on accurate estimates that reflected changes in the program's direction.
  • Partially satisfied the condition to identify the deployment timeline for the system. While the plan outlined milestone dates for achieving enhanced data interoperability and other near-term activities, it did not include a deployment timeline that could be linked to an integrated master schedule.
  • Partially satisfied the condition to break out information related to the IPO's annual and total spending for each department on iEHR. For example, the plan included the total amount obligated as well as a funding profile that showed the funds available for execution in 2013. However, program officials could not provide the basis for the spending estimates, as reported. In addition, according to VA officials, estimates reported did not consistently reflect the current approach to pursue two separate systems.
  • Partially satisfied the condition to establish data standardization schedules by including high-level data mapping activities. However, the plan did not include a schedule for achieving data standardization.
  • Partially satisfied the condition to comply with acquisition rules, requirements, guidelines, and systems acquisition management practices of the federal government. IPO officials asserted compliance with acquisition rules, but the plan did not explain the basis for this assertion.

Program officials stated that the focus of the work described in the plan was on the near-term activities that were prioritized following the change in approach to iEHR, but the budget and estimated spending amounts in the expenditure plan did not reflect the new direction of the program because the acquisition guidance from the department was not issued until after the plan had been completed. Thus, the expenditure plan did not provide an accurate view of the cost of the work to be done, nor offer significant insight into the future path for building electronic health record interoperability between the departments. As such, the plan does not provide adequate information for Congress, VA, and DOD to use it as a basis for measuring program success, accounting for the use of current and future appropriations, and holding the departments accountable for achieving an interoperable electronic health record.

Why GAO Did This Study

VA and DOD initiated the iEHR program with the intent of developing a single, common electronic health record system to replace their existing health record systems. However, the departments subsequently changed their approach and instead began pursuing separate efforts to modernize or replace their existing systems and ensure their interoperability. The 2013 appropriations act restricted the obligation of VA and DOD fiscal year 2013 funds for the development of iEHR to not more than 25 percent until an expenditure plan that satisfied statutory conditions, including being reviewed by GAO, was submitted to the Senate and House Appropriations Committees. GAO's objective was to determine the extent to which the iEHR expenditure plan satisfied six statutory conditions. To accomplish this, GAO analyzed the contents of the plan against the statutory conditions and applicable documentation, such as the President's budget, to determine whether the plan met the conditions.

Recommendations

GAO is recommending that the departments ensure that any future expenditure plans include verifiable and accurate budget, cost, and spending information; a deployment timeline that is consistent with an integrated master schedule; a data standardization schedule; and the basis for their assertion of compliance with acquisition rules, requirements, guidelines, and systems acquisition management practices of the federal government. In joint comments on a draft of this report, DOD and VA concurred with GAO's recommendation.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Defense To ensure that Congress has the information necessary to effectively oversee the efforts of VA and DOD to deliver an interoperable health record and hold the departments accountable for program results, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs should direct the appropriate organization to ensure that any future expenditure plans (1) include verifiable and accurate budget, cost, and spending information reflecting the approach to the departments' electronic health records programs; (2) provide a deployment timeline that is consistent with an integrated master schedule and shows how deployment activities are related to one another within the scope of the electronic health records programs; (3) include a data standardization schedule for facilitating interoperability as it relates to the departments' electronic health records programs; and (4) provide the basis for an assertion of compliance with acquisition rules, requirements, guidelines, and systems acquisition management practices of the federal government.
Closed – Implemented
The Department of Defense (DOD) has taken actions that are consistent with our recommendation. Specifically, the department has focused its interoperable health record efforts on acquiring a replacement electronic health record system through the DOD Health Management System Modernization (DHMSM) program, and increasing interoperability with the Department of Veterans Affairs and other public and private-sector medical providers through the Defense Medical Information Exchange (DMIX) program. In July 2015, the department awarded a contract through the DHMSM program and plans an initial deployment in December 2016 of its Military Health System GENESIS, which is intended to eventually replace selected DOD legacy health systems. Further, in November 2015, the department certified that it had met the interoperability requirements in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. In addition, officials from the Office of the Secretary of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) performed an independent cost estimate for the DHMSM program; the department also included its electronic health record modernization milestones in the July 2015 Joint Interoperability Plan, which reports planned milestones through the full operating capability that is expected at the end of fiscal year 2022. These steps generally provide information that is needed to strengthen the basis of the department's planned expenditures for interoperable health records, as we recommended in 2014.
Department of Veterans Affairs To ensure that Congress has the information necessary to effectively oversee the efforts of VA and DOD to deliver an interoperable health record and hold the departments accountable for program results, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs should direct the appropriate organization to ensure that any future expenditure plans (1) include verifiable and accurate budget, cost, and spending information reflecting the approach to the departments' electronic health records programs; (2) provide a deployment timeline that is consistent with an integrated master schedule and shows how deployment activities are related to one another within the scope of the electronic health records programs; (3) include a data standardization schedule for facilitating interoperability as it relates to the departments' electronic health records programs; and (4) provide the basis for an assertion of compliance with acquisition rules, requirements, guidelines, and systems acquisition management practices of the federal government.
Closed – Implemented
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has taken steps on its electronic health record efforts consistent with our recommendation. Specifically, VA has identified expected costs related to its efforts and continues to report these estimates to Congress. In addition, the VistA Evolution program has identified high-level milestones for deployment. For example, program documentation describes four product sets as part of its phased modernization approach that identifies capabilities to be achieved within a defined schedule. VA also has issued an initial, as well as an updated, independent cost estimate for the program and developed an integrated master schedule and updated VistA 4 Roadmap. Further, VA has stated in its VistA 4 Roadmap that it will follow guidance issued by the Interagency Program Office that details the Department of Defense's and VA's plans for interoperability and data standardization and has reported progress toward satisfying congressional deadlines related to mapping health data from its legacy systems to facilitate interoperability. The department also has identified its governance structure for VistA Evolution and stated that development of VistA 4 will follow a tailored approach of VA's Project Management Accountability System. These steps generally provide the information that is needed as the basis for planned expenditures, as we recommended in 2014.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AccountabilityBudget activitiesBudget functionsDefense procurementElectronic health recordsIT acquisitionsInformation technologyInteroperabilityMedical information systemsMedical recordsPlanning programming budgetingProcurement planningUse of funds