Skip to Highlights
Highlights

In 2003, GAO found that women, on average, earned 80 percent of what men earned in 2000 and workplace discrimination may be one contributing factor. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Department of Labor (Labor) enforce several laws intended to prevent gender pay discrimination. GAO examined (1) how EEOC enforces laws addressing gender pay disparities among private sector employers and provides outreach and what is known about its performance, and (2) how Labor enforces laws addressing gender pay disparities among federal contractors and provides outreach and what is known about its performance. GAO analyzed relevant laws, regulations, monitoring reports, and agency enforcement data and conducted interviews at the agencies' central offices and two field offices experienced in gender pay cases.

Skip to Recommendations

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1. To gauge how well EEOC is carrying out its responsibilities regarding gender pay discrimination, the Chair of the EEOC should devise a cost-effective method to improve its ability to monitor the performance of its gender pay enforcement efforts relative to other areas, using information already captured in its databases and supplementing information already reported.
Closed - Implemented
EEOC has created a specialized report from its information technology system tracking charges of gender pay discrimination by statute, including the Equal Pay Act, Title VII, and other statutes, and has used this report to generate historical gender pay data dating from FY 1997. EEOC plans to continue generating this data each quarter and to use this information to track and respond to trends in gender pay enforcement. EEOC has also incorporated this information into its budget and performance planning. EEOC noted that having this information available helped it respond effectively when Title VII was amended by the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in early 2009.
Department of Labor 2. To strengthen OFCCP's enforcement and outreach efforts and gauge the performance of those efforts, the Secretary of Labor should direct the Director of OFCCP to evaluate the Westat mathematical model and incorporate lessons learned from the prior model to ensure contractors are appropriately being selected for compliance evaluations and to maximize limited enforcement resources.
Closed - Implemented
In 2008, OFCCP evaluated the Westat model in-house and found that it was not an effective means of selecting contractors that were more likely to have findings of non-compliance. In 2011, OFCCP contracted with IMPAQ International to create a new model based on more current OFCCP administrative data and EEO-1 survey data submitted by contractors (which includes the total number of employees by race, gender, ethnicity and occupational categories). Internal evaluations found this new model to be statistically significantly more predictive of non-compliance than either the Westat model or random chance. Additionally, according to OFCCP officials, the IMPAQ model will improve on two of the problems identified with the method used prior to the Westat model: identifying all contractors, and ensuring complete and reliable data. Previously, contractors that did not fill out the EEO-1 survey were not included in the selection pool. Now, the contractors are selected from the Federal Procurement Data System, a more complete listing of contractors. Furthermore, OFCCP has taken steps to improve the reliability of its administrative data, which forms an important part of the IMPAQ model.
Department of Labor 3. To strengthen OFCCP's enforcement and outreach efforts and gauge the performance of those efforts, the Secretary of Labor should direct the Director of OFCCP to improve oversight of compliance evaluations for contractors by establishing linkages between relevant and current guidance on conducting compensation self-evaluations and devising a unique violation code to document any non-compliance with the compensation selfevaluation requirement.
Closed - Not Implemented
OFCCP did not create a unique code to document such non-compliance. Additionally, in 2006, OFCCP created voluntary standards that contractors could choose to follow when conducting their self-evaluations. However, we found that the guidance about the differences between the voluntary and mandatory self-evaluation requirements was confusing and outdated. To help remedy this, we recommended that OFCCP make its guidance about self-evaluations easier to find, both for contractors and its own employees. To date, OFCCP has begun the process of rescinding the voluntary guidelines. When this process is complete, it should lessen the confusion. However, OFCCP has not taken any steps to update or clarify its guidance for the mandatory self-evaluation that contractors must undertake to satisfy their affirmative action requirements. For this reason, and because there is still no discrete violation code for failure to complete a compensation self-evaluation, this recommendation has not been implemented.
Department of Labor 4. To strengthen OFCCP's enforcement and outreach efforts and gauge the performance of those efforts, the Secretary of Labor should direct the Director of OFCCP to ensure the planned new data system incorporates standardized data entry instructions and adequate internal controls to screen for erroneous, inconsistent, or missing data, and ensures violation codes are correctly entered.
Closed - Implemented
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) awarded a contract for its new data system, to be called the Federal Contract Compliance System (FCCS), in FY 2011. According to OFCCP documents, the new system will modernize agency data collection and methods to include standardized and configurable workflows, business rules for quality management, case management data validation, alerts and notifications, document management, records management, robust reporting, security, privacy, and accountability safeguards. Additionally, OFCCP plans to make efforts to correct inaccuracies and enter missing fields in its current data. They will also address inconsistencies in data entry and accuracy via enhanced data integrity reporting, data quality reviews, and by holding employees and supervisors accountable for maintaining data integrity through their performance reviews. OFCCP expects FCCS to begin operation in late 2012.
Department of Labor 5. To strengthen OFCCP's enforcement and outreach efforts and gauge the performance of those efforts, the Secretary of Labor should direct the Director of OFCCP to develop a cost-effective means for monitoring performance of gender pay enforcement efforts relative to other areas, using information generally already captured in existing databases, once determined reliable.
Closed - Implemented
Since the time of our review, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has greatly increased its focus on compensation, although it does not monitor these efforts by discrimination factors such as gender or race. In its FY 2012 operating plan, OFCCP identified two performance goals that it would use to monitor compensation enforcement efforts on a quarterly basis: increases in (1) the number of notices of violations and (2) the number of conciliation agreements with findings of pay discrimination. While neither of these is specific to gender, over half of OFCCP's pay discrimination cases involve gender, with the rest involving race. In addition, OFCCP created new compensation evaluation guidelines for its compliance officers in 2012, which aim to improve the quality and depth of its compensation evaluations. They further plan to have the national office review a sample of completed compensation assessments to ensure that the new guidance is properly implemented, to see whether it is clear and effective in practice, and to address deficiencies immediately through revision and/or additional training and tools. Finally, at the end of each quarter, OFCCP will prepare a qualitative review, which will assess the extent to which its compensation evaluations address systemic issues and identify any gaps in training or implementation.
Department of Labor 6. To strengthen OFCCP's enforcement and outreach efforts and gauge the performance of those efforts, the Secretary of Labor should direct the Director of OFCCP to devise a method for systematically collecting feedback from recipients of outreach and technical assistance and using this information to measure and monitor outreach performance.
Closed - Implemented
According to Labor, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP) developed a feedback form and began distributing it to contractors receiving compliance and technical assistance in FY 2009. Analysis of this feedback was included in OFCCP's semi-annual Compliance Assistance Plan beginning March 31, 2009. Additionally, from September 2009 to June 2010, OFCCP sent feedback surveys to over 9,000 webinar participants, 40 percent of whom returned the surveys. Labor reports that OFCCP used the feedback to plan future technical assistance.

Full Report