What GAO Found
MCC projects that the Vanuatu compacts transportation infrastructure projects will provide direct benefits such as reduced transportation costs and induced benefits from growth in tourism and agriculture. MCC estimated the costs and benefits over 20 years, with benefits beginning in full in 2008 or 2009 and growing each year, and it counted poor, rural beneficiaries by defining the area where benefits were likely to accrue. Using projected benefits and costs, MCC calculated the compacts economic rate of return (ERR) and its effects on Vanuatus gross domestic product (GDP) and per capita income.
MCCs portrayal of the projected impact does not reflect its underlying data. MCC states that per capita income will increase by approximately $200, or 15 percent, by 2010 and by $488, or 37 percent, by 2015. However, MCCs underlying data show that these figures represent the sum of individual years gains in per capita income relative to 2005 and that actual gains will be $51, or 3.9 percent, in 2010 and $61, or 4.6 percent, in 2015. MCC also states that GDP will increase by an additional 3 percent a year, but its data show that after GDP growth of 6 percent in 2007, the economys growth will continue at about 3 percent, as it would without the compact. MCC states that the compact will benefit approximately 65,000 poor, rural inhabitants, but this statement does not identify the financial benefits that accrue to the rural poor or reflect its own analysis that 57 percent of benefits go to others.
We identified five key risks that could affect the compacts projected impacts. (1) Cost estimate contingencies may not be sufficient to cover project overruns. (2) Compact benefits will likely accrue more slowly than MCC projected. (3) Benefit estimates assume continued maintenance, but MCCs ability to ensure maintenance will end in 2011, and Vanuatus maintenance record is poor. (4) Induced benefits depend on businesses and residents response to new opportunities. (5) Efficiency gains, such as time saved in transit, may not increase per capita income. Our analysis of these areas of risk illustrates the extent that MCCs projections are dependent on assumptions of immediate realization of benefits, long-term maintenance, realization of induced benefits, and benefits from efficiency gains.
Why GAO Did This Study
In January 2004, Congress established the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) for foreign assistance. Congress has appropriated almost $6 billion to MCC. As of March 2007, MCC had signed almost $3 billion in compacts with 11 countries, including a 5-year, $65.7 million compact with Vanuatu. MCC states that the Vanuatu compact will have a transformational effect on the countrys economy, increasing per capita income and GDP and benefiting 65,000 poor, rural people. GAO examined (1) MCCs methods of projecting economic benefits, (2) MCCs portrayal and analysis of the projected benefits, and (3) risks that may affect the compacts impact. GAO reviewed MCC's analyses and met with officials and business owners in Vanuatu as well as with other donors.
GAO recommends that the Chief Executive Officer of MCC (1) revise the public reporting of the Vanuatu compacts projected impact, (2) assess whether similar reporting in other compacts accurately reflects underlying analyses, and (3) improve its economic analyses by more fully accounting for risks to project benefits. MCC did not directly address our recommendations but commented that it had not intended to make misleading statements and that its portrayal of projected results was factual and consistent with underlying data.
Recommendations for Executive Action
|Millennium Challenge Corporation||The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of MCC should revise the public reporting of the Vanuatu compact's projected impact to clearly represent the underlying data and analysis.|
|Millennium Challenge Corporation||The CEO of MCC should assess whether similar statements in other compacts accurately reflect the underlying data and analysis.|
|Millennium Challenge Corporation||The CEO of MCC should improve economic analysis by phasing the costs and benefits in compact ERR calculations and by more fully accounting for risks such as those related to continuing maintenance, induced benefits, and monetized efficiency gains as part of sensitivity analysis.|