Nuclear Waste: DOE Should Reassess Whether the Bulk Vitrification Demonstration Project at Its Hanford Site Is Still Needed to Treat Radioactive Waste
GAO-07-762
Published: Jun 12, 2007. Publicly Released: Jun 12, 2007.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
Skip to Recommendations
The Department of Energy (DOE) is demonstrating a technology called bulk vitrification, in parallel with the Hanford waste treatment plant, to treat a portion of the radioactive waste stored in 177 tanks at its Hanford site in southeastern Washington state. DOE faces technical and management problems that have affected the original objectives to justify demonstrating the bulk vitrification technology. This report discusses the extent to which DOE (1) has managed the bulk vitrification demonstration project consistent with DOE management guidance and (2) continues to need a supplemental technology, such as bulk vitrification, to treat a portion of the low-activity tank waste. To assess DOE's management of the project, GAO reviewed reports by DOE and others and discussed the project with DOE and contractor officials.
Recommendations
Matter for Congressional Consideration
| Matter | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Congress may wish to consider withholding future funding for the demonstration until the department conducts and reports on a reassessment that clearly confirms the need for a supplemental technology at Hanford and bulk vitrification as a viable alternative for treating Hanford's low-activity waste. | The department withheld funding on the bulk vitrification project until it conducted a reassessment of the need for the project. The department's reassessment ultimately resulted in the project's cancellation. Accordingly, DOE cancelled further funding on the project beginning in FY 2009. (See relevant status explanations below for details.) |
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Energy | In light of major changes that have occurred on both the bulk vitrification demonstration and the waste treatment plant, which may affect the demonstration's costs, schedule, and mission justification, the Secretary of Energy should direct the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management to reassess the need for a supplemental technology to treat a portion of Hanford's low-activity tank waste. The reassessment should clearly identify how a supplemental technology would complement and be integrated with waste treatment plant operations. |
DOE expanded the scope of an ongoing study, originally slated for release in June 2007 but delayed until November 2007 to address our recommendation. This study concluded that DOE should continue to pursue developing a supplemental technology to accelerate tank waste cleanup at Hanford but did not endorse bulk vitrification as the best option. DOE commissioned an external study of waste treatment plant operations, including supplemental technologies for low-activity waste. This external technical review, which was issued in November 2008, concluded that a bulk vitrification facility was not the best option for meeting the tank waste treatment schedule.
|
| Department of Energy | In light of major changes that have occurred on both the bulk vitrification demonstration and the waste treatment plant, which may affect the demonstration's costs, schedule, and mission justification, the Secretary of Energy should direct the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management to, if a reassessment shows that a supplemental technology is still needed, reassess the relative costs and benefits of demonstrating and deploying bulk vitrification compared with other viable technologies, such as constructing a second low-activity waste vitrification facility. |
In response to our report, DOE reassessed the bulk vitrification demonstration project and other available technologies to treat low-activity waste at Hanford. DOE expanded the scope of an ongoing study, originally slated for release in June 2007 but delayed until November 2007 to address our recommendation. This study concluded that DOE should continue to pursue developing a supplemental technology to accelerate tank waste cleanup at Hanford but did not endorse bulk vitrification as the best option.
|
| Department of Energy | In light of major changes that have occurred on both the bulk vitrification demonstration and the waste treatment plant, which may affect the demonstration's costs, schedule, and mission justification, the Secretary of Energy should direct the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management to report to Congress on the results of the reassessment before requesting additional funding for the bulk vitrification project. |
DOE commissioned an external study of waste treatment plant operations, including supplemental technologies for low-activity waste. This external technical review, which was issued in November 2008, concluded that a bulk vitrification facility was not the best option for meeting the tank waste treatment schedule. In late 2008, on the basis of these reports and the problems encountered with the bulk vitrification demonstration project, DOE decided to cancel the bulk vitrification demonstration project. In March 2009, the assistant manager of DOE's Office of River Protection stated that DOE's tank waste life-cycle cost and schedule baseline, currently being revised, would no longer include a bulk vitrification facility. Consistent with our recommendation, DOE reassessed the need and benefits for bulk vitrification and ultimately decided to cancel the bulk vitrification project.
|