GAO reviewed the Federal Communication Commission's (Commission) new rule on the modernization of the Commission's competitive bidding rules and procedures. GAO found that (1) the final rule modifies the Commission's competitive bidding rules as necessitated by the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act and (2) the Commission complied with the applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Federal Communications Commission: Implementation of the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act and Modernization of the Commission's Competitive Bidding Rules and Procedures, GAO-06-441R, February 16, 2006
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission (Commission), entitled Implementation of the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act and Modernization of the Commission's Competitive Bidding Rules and Procedures (WT Docket No. 05-211; FCC 06-4). We received the rule on February 6, 2006. It was published in the Federal Register as a final rule on February 7, 2006. 71 Fed. Reg. 6214.
The final rule modifies the Commission's competitive bidding rules as necessitated by the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act.
Enclosed is our assessment of the Commission's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that the Commission complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Patricia Dalton, Managing Director, Physical Infrastructure. Ms. Dalton can be reached at (202) 512-2834.
Kathleen E. Wannisky
Managing Associate General Counsel
ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
"IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMERCIAL SPECTRUM ENHANCEMENT ACT AND MODERNIZATION OF THE COMMISSION'S COMPETITIVE BIDDING
RULES AND PROCEDURES"
(WT DOCKET NO. 05-211; FCC 06-4)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The Commission is not required to prepare and did not prepare a cost-benefit analysis for the final rule.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607, and 609
The Commission prepared both an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in connection with the proposed and final rules, respectively. Both analyses comply with the requirements of the Act. Among the steps taken to reduce the burden on small entities, the Commission has selected the pro rata option as the best method of equitably apportioning tribal land bidding credits among the largest number of qualified applicants.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
As an independent regulatory agency, the Commission is not subject to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
The final rule was issued using the notice and comment procedures found at 5 U.S.C. 553. On July 27, 2005, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register. 70 Fed. Reg. 43372. In response, the Commission received comments from five parties and the comments are discussed in the preamble to the final rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
The final rule does not contain any new or modified information collections subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The final rule is promulgated pursuant to the authority found at 15 U.S.C. 79 et seq. and 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 157, 225, and 303(r).
Executive Order No. 12866
As an independent regulatory agency, the Commission is not subject to the review requirements of the order.