Skip to Highlights
Highlights

The southern Africa food crisis threatened 15.3 million people in six countries (Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Swaziland, Zambia, and Zimbabwe) with famine. GAO was asked to look at (1) factors that contributed to the crisis, (2) how well the populations' needs were met, (3) obstacles to the food aid effort, and (4) challenges to emerging from crisis.

Skip to Recommendations

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Agriculture To maximize the effectiveness of the U.S. response to future food crises in the southern Africa region as well as in other parts of the world, the Secretaries of State and Agriculture and the Administrator of USAID should initiate a comprehensive review of the issues pertaining to biotech foods in emergency food aid. In anticipation of future food crises, this review could consider measures such as (1) encouraging recipient countries to enhance their capacity to make informed decisions regarding agricultural biotechnology and offering technical assistance in this endeavor; (2) identifying which countries are likely to accept, restrict, or reject biotech food aid; and (3) determining ways that the United States can contribute to emergency food aid needs in countries that decide to restrict or reject biotech food aid.
Closed - Implemented
In response to the GAO recommendation, State, Agriculture and USAID initiated a limited review of biotech food aid issues which involved a comprehensive survey of overseas post and have continued to dialogue with host countries in southern Africa regarding biotechnology, providing technical assistance to improve capabilities in this area. Since the 2002 southern Africa food crisis there have been no further significant delays or logistical problems related to biotech food aid. The regional governments' regulations on food transportation have not changed significantly since that time. The USAID Office of Food For Peace, in coordination with State, USDA, and its NGO implementing partners, has adapted the emergency food aid basket to comply with recipient country regulations in order to avoid any issues. Whole grain U.S. corn has not been sent to region since 2002, except to Swaziland, which continues to accept it. U.S. cornmeal and bulgur wheat shipments have increased significantly to those countries which accept processed corn products. Shipments of whole grain sorghum, which is not biotech, have also increased dramatically, especially to programs in Zambia which continues to reject even processed biotech commodities. USAID, State, and Agriculture have launched a number of coordinated biotech initiatives in Africa which address the harmonization of biosafety frameworks; increased biotech outreach and technical assistance to African countries; increased biotech capacity building and communication, and related technology development.
Department of State To maximize the effectiveness of the U.S. response to future food crises in the southern Africa region as well as in other parts of the world, the Secretaries of State and Agriculture and the Administrator of USAID should initiate a comprehensive review of the issues pertaining to biotech foods in emergency food aid. In anticipation of future food crises, this review could consider measures such as (1) encouraging recipient countries to enhance their capacity to make informed decisions regarding agricultural biotechnology and offering technical assistance in this endeavor; (2) identifying which countries are likely to accept, restrict, or reject biotech food aid; and (3) determining ways that the United States can contribute to emergency food aid needs in countries that decide to restrict or reject biotech food aid.
Closed - Implemented
In response to the GAO recommendation, State, Agriculture and USAID initiated a limited review of biotech food aid issues which involved a comprehensive survey of overseas post and have continued to dialogue with host countries in southern Africa regarding biotechnology, providing technical assistance to improve capabilities in this area. Since the 2002 southern Africa food crisis there have been no further significant delays or logistical problems related to biotech food aid. The regional governments' regulations on food transportation have not changed significantly since that time. The USAID Office of Food For Peace, in coordination with State, USDA, and its NGO implementing partners, has adapted the emergency food aid basket to comply with recipient country regulations in order to avoid any issues. Whole grain U.S. corn has not been sent to region since 2002, except to Swaziland, which continues to accept it. U.S. cornmeal and bulgur wheat shipments have increased significantly to those countries which accept processed corn products. Shipments of whole grain sorghum, which is not biotech, have also increased dramatically, especially to programs in Zambia which continues to reject even processed biotech commodities. USAID, State, and Agriculture have launched a number of coordinated biotech initiatives in Africa which address the harmonization of biosafety frameworks; increased biotech outreach and technical assistance to African countries; increased biotech capacity building and communication, and related technology development.
Agency for International Development To maximize the effectiveness of the U.S. response to future food crises in the southern Africa region as well as in other parts of the world, the Secretaries of State and Agriculture and the Administrator of USAID should initiate a comprehensive review of the issues pertaining to biotech foods in emergency food aid. In anticipation of future food crises, this review could consider measures such as (1) encouraging recipient countries to enhance their capacity to make informed decisions regarding agricultural biotechnology and offering technical assistance in this endeavor; (2) identifying which countries are likely to accept, restrict, or reject biotech food aid; and (3) determining ways that the United States can contribute to emergency food aid needs in countries that decide to restrict or reject biotech food aid.
Closed - Implemented
In response to the GAO recommendation, State, Agriculture and USAID initiated a limited review of biotech food aid issues which involved a comprehensive survey of overseas post and have continued to dialogue with host countries in southern Africa regarding biotechnology, providing technical assistance to improve capabilities in this area. Since the 2002 southern Africa food crisis there have been no further significant delays or logistical problems related to biotech food aid. The regional governments' regulations on food transportation have not changed significantly since that time. The USAID Office of Food For Peace, in coordination with State, USDA, and its NGO implementing partners, has adapted the emergency food aid basket to comply with recipient country regulations in order to avoid any issues. Whole grain U.S. corn has not been sent to region since 2002, except to Swaziland, which continues to accept it. U.S. cornmeal and bulgur wheat shipments have increased significantly to those countries which accept processed corn products. Shipments of whole grain sorghum, which is not biotech, have also increased dramatically, especially to programs in Zambia which continues to reject even processed biotech commodities. USAID, State, and Agriculture have launched a number of coordinated biotech initiatives in Africa which address the harmonization of biosafety frameworks; increased biotech outreach and technical assistance to African countries; increased biotech capacity building and communication, and related technology development.
Department of Agriculture To further food security in the region, the Secretaries of State and Agriculture and the Administrator of USAID should work with international organizations, donors, and national governments to develop a comprehensive, targeted strategy to ensure sustained recovery that (1) integrates agricultural development, HIV/AIDS awareness and action, natural disaster management, and other appropriate interventions; (2) estimates costs and resource requirements; and (3) establishes a plan for mobilizing resources, a timetable for achieving results, and indicators for measuring performance.
Closed - Implemented
In response to the GAO recommendation, State, Agriculture and USAID established a Southern Africa Food Security Working Group in 2003 to coordinate U.S. Government policy and programs on assisting southern Africa to achieve sustainable food security. The goal was seen as supportive of the U.S. Government's pledge, made together with 185 other countries at the World Food Summit in 1996 to cut world hunger in half by 2015. The establishment of the Working Group and a related U.S. southern Africa recovery strategy was superseded by the 2003 Presidential Initiative to End Hunger in Africa (IEHA). The IHEA is particularly relevant to the recommendation in the GAO report. The primary objective of IEHA is to rapidly increase sustainable agricultural growth and rural incomes in sub-Saharan Africa. It was established to respond to the 2000 UN Millennium Goal of Cutting Hunger and Poverty in Half by 2015 and various related G-8 summit initiatives on hunger and poverty. As a Presidential Initiative, IHEA implementation is taking place on an interagency basis with USAID in a leadership position. It involves close participation from USDA and the State Department. IEHA places increased emphasis on programs to increase the use of modern technologies, expand credit to farmers, strengthen producer associations, improve the functioning of markets, and enhance economic incentives for farmers and small-scale entrepreneurs. The IHEA calls for a partnership with committed Africa leaders, with their governments and regional organizations, to work and invest in support of a smallholder-oriented, agricultural growth strategy. It recognizes that long-term substantial development in Africa also requires commitments from a wide array of partners, including other donors, the UN and multilateral development institutions, the private sector, universities and other non-government organizations. The IEHA is designed to facilitate active participation with these groups and African national governments and regional organizations. Under the leadership of USAID, IEHA is the vehicle through which the U.S. government meets its G-8 commitments to support implementation of the Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Program (CAADP), an ambitious agricultural effort for Africa. The CAADP was endorsed in 2003 by African heads of state and government under the auspices of the New Partnership for Africa?s Development (NEPAD). The IEHA process includes 35 performance indicators to evaluate performance in each African country. These indicators measure food security, hunger and nutrition, agricultural productivity and the political and policy environment for making improvements in food security. In 1996, IHEA operated on a $195 million dollar a year budget which includes $100 million for U.S. Title II food aid, $75.5 million for development assistance, and $19.8 million for the famine fund. IHEA focuses its limited resources on nine countries with the greatest need and the most conducive environment for change (three in southern Africa: Malawi, Mozambique, and Zambia). However, IEHA also encourages political and policy changes in other countries that could eventually qualify for more resources to increase food security.
Department of State To further food security in the region, the Secretaries of State and Agriculture and the Administrator of USAID should work with international organizations, donors, and national governments to develop a comprehensive, targeted strategy to ensure sustained recovery that (1) integrates agricultural development, HIV/AIDS awareness and action, natural disaster management, and other appropriate interventions; (2) estimates costs and resource requirements; and (3) establishes a plan for mobilizing resources, a timetable for achieving results, and indicators for measuring performance.
Closed - Implemented
In response to the GAO recommendation, State, Agriculture and USAID established a Southern Africa Food Security Working Group in 2003 to coordinate U.S. Government policy and programs on assisting southern Africa to achieve sustainable food security. The goal was seen as supportive of the U.S. Government's pledge, made together with 185 other countries at the World Food Summit in 1996 to cut world hunger in half by 2015. The establishment of the Working Group and a related U.S. southern Africa recovery strategy was superseded by the 2003 Presidential Initiative to End Hunger in Africa (IEHA). The IHEA is particularly relevant to the recommendation in the GAO report. The primary objective of IEHA is to rapidly increase sustainable agricultural growth and rural incomes in sub-Saharan Africa. It was established to respond to the 2000 UN Millennium Goal of Cutting Hunger and Poverty in Half by 2015 and various related G-8 summit initiatives on hunger and poverty. As a Presidential Initiative, IHEA implementation is taking place on an interagency basis with USAID in a leadership position. It involves close participation from USDA and the State Department. IEHA places increased emphasis on programs to increase the use of modern technologies, expand credit to farmers, strengthen producer associations, improve the functioning of markets, and enhance economic incentives for farmers and small-scale entrepreneurs. The IHEA calls for a partnership with committed Africa leaders, with their governments and regional organizations, to work and invest in support of a smallholder-oriented, agricultural growth strategy. It recognizes that long-term substantial development in Africa also requires commitments from a wide array of partners, including other donors, the UN and multilateral development institutions, the private sector, universities and other non-government organizations. The IEHA is designed to facilitate active participation with these groups and African national governments and regional organizations. Under the leadership of USAID, IEHA is the vehicle through which the U.S. government meets its G-8 commitments to support implementation of the Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Program (CAADP), an ambitious agricultural effort for Africa. The CAADP was endorsed in 2003 by African heads of state and government under the auspices of the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD). The IEHA process includes 35 performance indicators to evaluate performance in each African country. These indicators measure food security, hunger and nutrition, agricultural productivity and the political and policy environment for making improvements in food security. In 1996, IHEA operated on a $195 million dollar a year budget which includes $100 million for U.S. Title II food aid, $75.5 million for development assistance, and $19.8 million for the famine fund. IHEA focuses its limited resources on nine countries with the greatest need and the most conducive environment for change (three in southern Africa: Malawi, Mozambique, and Zambia). However, IEHA also encourages political and policy changes in other countries that could eventually qualify for more resources to increase food security.
Agency for International Development To further food security in the region, the Secretaries of State and Agriculture and the Administrator of USAID should work with international organizations, donors, and national governments to develop a comprehensive, targeted strategy to ensure sustained recovery that (1) integrates agricultural development, HIV/AIDS awareness and action, natural disaster management, and other appropriate interventions; (2) estimates costs and resource requirements; and (3) establishes a plan for mobilizing resources, a timetable for achieving results, and indicators for measuring performance.
Closed - Implemented
In response to the GAO recommendation, State, Agriculture and USAID established a Southern Africa Food Security Working Group in 2003 to coordinate U.S. Government policy and programs on assisting southern Africa to achieve sustainable food security. The goal was seen as supportive of the U.S. Government's pledge , made together with 185 other countries at the World Food Summit in 1996 to cut world hunger in half by 2015. The establishment of the Working Group and a related U.S. southern Africa recovery strategy was superseded by the 2003 Presidential Initiative to End Hunger in Africa (IEHA). The IHEA is particularly relevant to the recommendation in the GAO report. The primary objective of IEHA is to rapidly increase sustainable agricultural growth and rural incomes in sub-Saharan Africa. It was established to respond to the 2000 UN Millennium Goal of Cutting Hunger and Poverty in Half by 2015 and various related G-8 summit initiatives on hunger and poverty. As a Presidential Initiative, IHEA implementation is taking place on an interagency basis with USAID in a leadership position. It involves close participation from USDA and the State Department. IEHA places increased emphasis on programs to increase the use of modern technologies, expand credit to farmers, strengthen producer associations, improve the functioning of markets, and enhance economic incentives for farmers and small-scale entrepreneurs. The IHEA calls for a partnership with committed Africa leaders, with their governments and regional organizations, to work and invest in support of a smallholder-oriented, agricultural growth strategy. It recognizes that long-term substantial development in Africa also requires commitments from a wide array of partners, including other donors, the UN and multilateral development institutions, the private sector, universities and other non-government organizations. The IEHA is designed to facilitate active participation with these groups and African national governments and regional organizations. Under the leadership of USAID, IEHA is the vehicle through which the U.S. government meets its G-8 commitments to support implementation of the Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Program (CAADP), an ambitious agricultural effort for Africa. The CAADP was endorsed in 2003 by African heads of state and government under the auspices of the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD). The IEHA process includes 35 performance indicators to evaluate performance in each African country. These indicators measure food security, hunger and nutrition, agricultural productivity and the political and policy environment for making improvements in food security. In 1996, IHEA operated on a $195 million dollar a year budget which includes $100 million for U.S. Title II food aid, $75.5 million for development assistance, and $19.8 million for the famine fund. IHEA focuses its limited resources on nine countries with the greatest need and the most conducive environment for change (three in southern Africa: Malawi, Mozambique, and Zambia). However, IEHA also encourages political and policy changes in other countries that could eventually qualify for more resources to increase food security.

Full Report

GAO Contacts