Skip to Highlights
Highlights

The Department of Energy (DOE) oversees one of the largest cleanup programs in history--the treatment and disposal of 94 million gallons of highly radioactive nuclear waste from the nation's nuclear weapons program. This waste is currently at DOE sites in Washington, Idaho, and South Carolina. In 2002, DOE began an initiative to reduce the estimated $105-billion cost and 70-year time frame of this cleanup. GAO was asked to determine the status of this initiative, the legal and technical challenges DOE faces in implementing it, and any further opportunities to reduce costs or improve program management.

Skip to Recommendations

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Energy 1. To help ensure that DOE's accelerated cleanup initiative is effective and that cleanup of high-level waste proceeds in a timely and cost-effective manner, the Secretary of the Department of Energy should seek clarification from the Congress regarding DOE's authority for designating waste as incidental to reprocessing if the current challenge becomes an extended legal process, in order to help DOE determine what strategy it needs to move its initiative forward and realize potential savings.
Closed - Implemented
In response to this recommendation, in fiscal year 2004, DOE proposed legislative language aimed at clarifying the agency's authority for designating waste as incidental to reprocessing. Federal legislation was passed in October 2004 (P.L. 108-375, sec.3116) that provided DOE the authority to make these waste determinations at its Savannah River and Idaho National Laboratory sites. Although the law specifically excluded the Hanford Site, this recommendation has been implemented for the Savannah River Site and Idaho National Laboratory. Financial accomplishment reports were approved: GAO-05-1051A (SRS) and GAO-06-1546A.
Department of Energy 2. To help ensure that DOE's accelerated cleanup initiative is effective and that cleanup of high-level waste proceeds in a timely and cost-effective manner, the Secretary of the Department of Energy should reassess the potential risks, costs, and benefits of constructing an integrated pilot-scale waste separation facility at the Hanford site to more fully test separation technologies before completing construction of a full-scale facility.
Closed - Implemented
Although DOE initially did not agree with this GAO recommendation, in early 2007 DOE decided to build a pilot-scale facility for the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant to fully test pretreatment technologies before completing the full-scale design of the Waste Plant pretreatment facility. The DOE project manager acknowledged that the GAO recommendation affected the change in the department's approach to building and testing the pretreatment facility. An accomplishment was approved for this recommendation: GAO-07-1672A.
Department of Energy 3. To help ensure that DOE's accelerated cleanup initiative is effective and that cleanup of high-level waste proceeds in a timely and cost-effective manner, the Secretary of the Department of Energy should ensure that DOE's high-level waste projects (1) include a current and rigorous analysis of the risks, costs, and benefits associated with the decisions being implemented, in accordance with OMB guidance; (2) incorporate new technologies consistent with best practices and DOE guidance so that risks and costs are more effectively managed; and (3) are carefully evaluated as to the appropriateness of using a fast-track approach to designing and constructing complex nuclear facilities, and that the potential risks and costs associated with this approach are explicitly identified and considered.
Closed - Implemented
DOE's new project management order 413.3A, issued in July 2006, requires all DOE projects, including its high-level waste projects, include current and rigorous analyses of risks, estimated costs, and the benefits of embarking upon and/or continuing with existing projects to better enable department leaders in making choices between competing priorities. In addition, DOE is developing comprehensive standards for systematically measuring and communicating the readiness of project technologies. These standards will specify consistent metrics for determining technology readiness and establish terminology that will be consistently applied across projects. Finally, the department has taken steps to ensure projects have validated earned value management systems in place to better manage the design and construction of complex nuclear facilities and that the risks and costs associated with fast-track design-build approaches are understood before major project decisions are made. Regarding the fast-track, design-build approach, the Dept. sent a letter on Sept. 8, 2006 accepting this recommendation and stated it would discontinue using a fast-track, design-build approach to completing the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant. An accomplishment was approved: GAO-07-1716A,

Full Report