Skip to main content

B-225770, MAR 12, 1987, 87-1 CPD 281

B-225770 Mar 12, 1987
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

PROCUREMENT - BID PROTESTS - GAO PROCEDURES - PROTEST TIMELINESS - 10 DAY RULE - ADVERSE AGENCY ACTIONS DIGEST: PROTEST FILED 11 WORKING DAYS AFTER PROTESTER RECEIVED HAND DELIVERED DENIAL OF PROTEST TO AGENCY IS UNTIMELY. SINCE BOOZ-ALLEN'S PROTEST WAS NOT FILED WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY OUR REGULATIONS. IT IS UNTIMELY. THE PROTEST IS DISMISSED.

View Decision

B-225770, MAR 12, 1987, 87-1 CPD 281

PROCUREMENT - BID PROTESTS - GAO PROCEDURES - PROTEST TIMELINESS - 10 DAY RULE - ADVERSE AGENCY ACTIONS DIGEST: PROTEST FILED 11 WORKING DAYS AFTER PROTESTER RECEIVED HAND DELIVERED DENIAL OF PROTEST TO AGENCY IS UNTIMELY.

BOOZ-ALLEN & HAMILTON, INC.:

BOOZ-ALLEN & HAMILTON, INC., PROTESTS THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY'S AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. DAAB07-87-D-A001 TO SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SDC).

BOOZ-ALLEN INITIALLY PROTESTED TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER. THE ARMY HAS FURNISHED A STATEMENT FROM THE CONTRACTING OFFICER AND AN AFFIDAVIT FROM A PROCUREMENT ASSISTANT WHICH STATE THAT A REPRESENTATIVE OF BOOZ ALLEN PICKED UP THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S DENIAL OF THE PROTEST ON FEBRUARY 9, 1987. BOOZ-ALLEN DID NOT FILE ITS PROTEST WITH OUR OFFICE UNTIL FEBRUARY 25, 11 WORKING DAYS LATER.

WHEN A PROTEST HAS BEEN FILED WITH A CONTRACTING AGENCY, OUR BID PROTEST REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT ANY SUBSEQUENT PROTEST TO OUR OFFICE BE FILED WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS OF NOTICE OF THE AGENCY'S INITIAL ADVERSE ACTION. 4 C.F.R. SEC. 21.2(A)(3) (1986). SINCE BOOZ-ALLEN'S PROTEST WAS NOT FILED WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY OUR REGULATIONS, IT IS UNTIMELY.

THE PROTEST IS DISMISSED.

GAO Contacts

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries