Two Army optometry officers requested a waiver of salary overpayments that occurred when the Army erroneously granted them service credit for time they spent in a training program before they entered active duty. The officers contended that the Army: (1) and GAO granted waivers to other optometry officers under similar circumstances, but denied them waivers based on an Army newsletter that warned them of a possible error; and (2) repeatedly advised them that there was no error in its computation of their salaries. GAO held that: (1) the newsletter was insufficient to notify the officers of an actual error in their salary entitlements, given the Army's repeated assurances that there was no error; and (2) the officers were liable for only those overpayments which they received after the Army notified them personally of the overpayments. Accordingly, the officers were granted partial waivers.
Skip to Highlights