Skip to main content

[Protest of Navy Contract Award]

B-209964 Published: Dec 22, 1982. Publicly Released: Dec 22, 1982.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A firm protested the award of a maintenance contract on the ground that the awardee's bid was nonresponsive to a specification in an amendment to the solicitation. A protest was also filed with the agency; that protest was denied and an appeal was still pending with the agency. GAO held that, if a protest is initially filed with the contracting agency, any subsequent protest to GAO must be filed within 10 working days of the protester's learning of the initial adverse agency action. A protester's appeal of the protest with the agency does not extend the time necessary for filing a protest with GAO. Since this protest was not filed with GAO within the required timeframe, it was untimely and not for consideration on its merits. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Bid responsivenessContract award protestsMaintenance services contractsNaval procurementUntimely protestsBid evaluation protestsU.S. NavyProtestsPublic worksIntellectual property rightsBid guaranteesBid protest regulationsConstructionLabor costsFederal regulations