Skip to main content

B-195105, JAN 29, 1980

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

DIGEST: PROTEST THAT COMPANY'S ALLEGEDLY DEFICIENT PRODUCT SHOULD BE ELIMINATED FROM CONSIDERATION UNDER RFP IS DISMISSED AS ACADEMIC. SINCE COMPANY WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL OFFEROR AND ANOTHER COMPANY THAT WAS DID NOT OFFER THAT PRODUCT. SALINITY CELLS SHOULD BE ELIMINATED FROM CONSIDERATION UNDER RFP N00104-79-R YU30 ISSUED BY THE NAVY SHIPS PARTS CONTROL CENTER BECAUSE MCNAB'S TESTING OF THE PRODUCT INDICATES IT IS NOT MEETING NAVY REQUIREMENTS AND MCNAB SURMISES THAT THE NAVY'S INCREASE IN THE QUANTITY OF CELLS BEING PROCURED IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THIS DEFICIENCY WHILE THE PROTEST WAS PENDING. OFFERS WERE RECEIVED FROM THREE OFFERORS. BECKMAN WAS NOT THE LOW OFFEROR. IT IS ACADEMIC WHETHER THE BECKMAN CELL SHOULD HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED FROM COMPETITION.

View Decision

GAO Contacts

Kenneth E. Patton
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Edward (Ed) Goldstein
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries