Skip to main content

Lapse in Appropriations

Please note that a lapse in appropriations has caused GAO to shut down its operations. Therefore, GAO will not be able to publish reports or otherwise update this website until GAO resumes operations. In addition, the vast majority of GAO personnel are not permitted to work. Consequently, calls or emails to agency personnel may not be returned until GAO resumes operations. For details on how the bid protest process will be handled during the shutdown, please see the legal decisions page. For information related to the GAO Personnel Appeals Board (PAB), please see the PAB webpage.

Unfair Advantage Due to Bid Evaluation Criteria

B-187872 Jun 03, 1977
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Protesters complained that the evaluation formula included in a solicitation permitted a competitor to use the formula to gain an unfair advantage. The Government's formula for evaluating bids, which does not reflect anticipated requirements, raises significant issues, notwithstanding the agency's view that the protest was untimely. Bid prices must be evaluated against the total and actual work to be awarded. The agency should resolicit the requirements on the basis of evaluation criteria reflecting the best estimate of its requirements. The award should be terminated if the bids received on resolicitation are found to be more advantageous, using the revised evaluation criteria.

Downloads

GAO Contacts

Kenneth E. Patton
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Edward (Ed) Goldstein
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries