The protesters objected to the prospective award of any contract to a company on the basis of a purported deficiency in that company's bid bond. The bid was submitted in the name of an apparent joint venture and was accompanied by a bid bond containing the name of a principal differing from that of one of the parties to the joint venture. The bid was nonresponsive because of the discrepancy, and the defect could not be cured by post-bid opening clarification. Prior sales contracts awarded on the basis of similar nonresponsive bids were legally defective, but corrective action was impractical since the contracts had been performed.
Skip to Highlights