As a result of a congressional inquiry, the question of whether a contract violated the Anti-Pinkerton Act was investigated. A company whose corporate charter specifically authorized investigative as well as protective functions and which was licensed as a detective agency was a detective agency for purposes of the Anti-Pinkerton Act and may not be employed by a Federal agency. The contract for guard services was awarded based upon the contractor's representations that it was not a detective agency; therefore, the contract should be canceled. In future procurements for guard services, the procuring agency should require adequate documentation concerning the bidder's or offeror's corporate authority and licensing status.
Skip to Highlights