B-17178 L/M, JUN 9, 1941
Highlights
REQUESTING DECISION WHETHER YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO MAKE PAYMENT ON A VOUCHER STATED IN FAVOR OF THE AMERICAN LUMBER CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $27.16 FOR TRANSPORTATION CHARGES ON 1. SHIPMENT WAS ACTUALLY MADE FROM BALTIMORE TO PEDRICKTOWN. IT IS UNDERSTOOD. IS THE COMMERCIAL CL RATE BETWEEN THOSE POINTS. PAYMENT WAS MADE ON THE BASIS OF THE CONTRACT PRICE. IT APPEARS THAT CONTRACTOR IS ENTITLED TO SOME FREIGHT ALLOWANCE. THIS OFFICE IS IN DOUBT AS TO THE PROPER ALLOWANCE. IT IS BELIEVED THAT HAD THE SHIPMENT BEEN MADE FROM ABERDEEN. THE LCL RATE WOULD HAVE BEEN CONSIDERABLY IN EXCESS OF THE 82[ RATE CHARGED. THE TIME REQUIRED FOR DELIVERY WOULD CERTAINLY HAVE BEEN MUCH GREATER. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LCL RATE FROM BALTIMORE TO PEDRICKTOWN IS 32[ PER CWT.
B-17178 L/M, JUN 9, 1941
PRECIS-UNAVAILABLE
LIEUTENANT COLONEL A. J. MAXWELL, F. D., U. S. ARMY,
THERE HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY FIRST INDORSEMENT OF MAY 22, 1941, FROM THE CHIEF OF FINANCE, YOUR LETTER OF MAY 16, 1941, REQUESTING DECISION WHETHER YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO MAKE PAYMENT ON A VOUCHER STATED IN FAVOR OF THE AMERICAN LUMBER CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $27.16 FOR TRANSPORTATION CHARGES ON 1,280 FEET OF LUMBER FURNISHED THE DELAWARE ORDNANCE DEPOT, PEDRICKTOWN, NEW JERSEY, UNDER CONTRACT NO. TPS-38039, DATED JANUARY 7, 1941 (CLASS 39, GENERAL SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES, PERIOD FEBRUARY 1, 1941, TO APRIL 30, 1941).
THE MATERIAL FACTS IN THE MATTER APPEAR TO BE SET FORTH IN YOUR SECOND INDORSEMENT OF APRIL 22, 1941, IN PERTINENT PART, AS FOLLOWS:
"2. THE VOUCHER IN QUESTION (11554 MARCH 1941, ACCOUNTS
OF THE UNDERSIGNED) COVERED 1280 BOARD FEET OF LUMBER, ITEM
39-L-32530, GENERAL SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES, PURCHASED
FROM THE AMERICAN LUMBER CORPORATION, BALTIMORE, MD. UNDER
TPS CONTRACT 38039. THAT CONTRACT STIPULATED AS THE
F. O. B. POINT, ABERDEEN, WASHINGTON, OR ANY OTHER POINT EQUAL
IN FREIGHT RATE TO DESTINATION. AS STATED IN PRECEDING
INDORSEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR, AT THE REQUEST OF THE PURCHASING
OFFICER, AND FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, FURNISHED
THE LUMBER FROM HIS STOCK IN BALTIMORE, MD. INSTEAD OF FROM
ABERDEEN, WASHINGTON, WITH A VERY SUBSTANTIAL SAVING IN TIME.
"3. SHIPMENT WAS ACTUALLY MADE FROM BALTIMORE TO
PEDRICKTOWN, N. J. BY CONTRACTOR'S TRUCK. CONTRACTOR CHARGED
THE LUMBER AT $2.49 PER HUNDRED FEET AND MADE AN ADDITIONAL
CHARGE OF $27.16 FOR FREIGHT FROM ABERDEEN, WASHINGTON, TO
PEDRICKTOWN, N. J. AT 82[ PER CWT., WHICH, IT IS UNDERSTOOD,
IS THE COMMERCIAL CL RATE BETWEEN THOSE POINTS. BECAUSE
OF CERTAIN DECISIONS OF THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL, FOR EXAMPLE,
8 COMP. GEN. 500 AND 18 COMP. GEN. 953, IT APPEARED THAT THE
CONTRACTOR MIGHT NOT BE ENTITLED TO THE FULL RATE FROM
ABERDEEN TO PEDRICKTOWN, AND SINCE THE CONTRACT APPEARS TO
PROVIDE NO BASIS FOR DETERMINING THE ALLOWANCE FOR SHIPMENT
BY CONTRACTOR'S TRUCK, PAYMENT WAS MADE ON THE BASIS OF THE
CONTRACT PRICE, EXCLUSIVE OF ALL FREIGHT CHARGES.
"4. IT APPEARS THAT CONTRACTOR IS ENTITLED TO SOME FREIGHT
ALLOWANCE, BUT BECAUSE OF THE ABOVE CITED DECISIONS, THIS
OFFICE IS IN DOUBT AS TO THE PROPER ALLOWANCE. IT IS
BELIEVED THAT HAD THE SHIPMENT BEEN MADE FROM ABERDEEN,
WASHINGTON, TO PEDRICKTOWN, N. J., EVEN ON A GOVERNMENT BILL
OF LADING, THE LCL RATE WOULD HAVE BEEN CONSIDERABLY IN
EXCESS OF THE 82[ RATE CHARGED, AND THE TIME REQUIRED FOR
DELIVERY WOULD CERTAINLY HAVE BEEN MUCH GREATER. IT IS
UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LCL RATE FROM BALTIMORE TO PEDRICKTOWN IS
32[ PER CWT. AT WHICH RATE THE FREIGHT CHARGES ON 3312
LBS. WOULD HAVE BEEN $10.60."
THE SITUATION HERE IS UNLIKE THAT INVOLVED IN 8 COMP. GEN. 500, WHERE THE MATTER THERE INVOLVED CONCERNED THE ADJUSTMENT OF FREIGHT CHARGES UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES AS SET FORTH IN FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THE SYLLABUS OF THAT DECISION AS FOLLOWS:
"UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH 12 OF FORM A AS
SET FORTH IN THE GENERAL SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES FOR 1928 AND
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN CONTRACTS FOR SUPPLIES
LISTED THEREIN, TRANSPORTATION CHARGES SAVED BY DELIVERY OF
SHIPMENTS OF 100 POUNDS OR MORE TO POINTS OTHER THAN
WASHINGTON, D. C., ACCRUE TO THE UNITED STATES. ON SUCH
SHIPMENTS THE UNITED STATES IS OBLIGATED TO PAY THE
TRANSPORTATION CHARGES AND THE CONTRACTOR TO DEDUCT FROM HIS
BILL AN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO FREIGHT CHARGES ON A LIKE
SHIPMENT FROM HIS SHIPPING POINT TO WASHINGTON, D. C." ALSO, IT IS UNLIKE THE MATTER CONSIDERED IN 18 COMP. GEN. 953 WHEREIN IT WAS HELD THAT (QUOTING FROM THE SYLLABUS):
"WHERE THE GOVERNMENT, FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE
CONTRACTOR, PERMITTED SHIPMENT FROM A PLACE OTHER THAN
F. O. B. POINT DESIGNATED IN THE CONTRACT, THE FACT THAT
THE FREIGHT CHARGES PAID BY THE GOVERNMENT TO THE CONTRACT
DESTINATION POINT ARE LESS THAN THE CHARGES WHICH WOULD HAVE
BEEN PAID HAD SHIPMENT BEEN MADE FROM THE CONTRACT SHIPPING
POINT CANNOT OPERATE TO AUTHORIZE PAYMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR
OF THE DIFFERENCE IN FREIGHT CHARGES SAVED TO THE GOVERNMENT."
IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE CONTRACTOR WAS REQUESTED TO EFFECT DELIVERY AT DESTINATION FROM ITS PLANT AT BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, RATHER THAN F. O. B. ABERDEEN, WASHINGTON, THE CONTRACT POINT, THIS FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT. THE CONTRACTOR ALLEGES THAT IT HAD ALREADY PAID FREIGHT FROM THE MILL AT ABERDEEN, WASHINGTON, TO ITS PLANT AT BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, AND HAS BORNE THE EXPENSE OF DELIVERY BY ITS OWN TRUCK FROM BALTIMORE TO PEDRICKTOWN, NEW JERSEY. IT APPEARS FROM APPLICABLE TARIFFS ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE THAT HAD SHIPMENT BEEN MADE ON GOVERNMENT BILL OF LADING FROM ABERDEEN, WASHINGTON, THE COST OF DELIVERY TO THE GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE BEEN CONSIDERABLY MORE THAN THE AMOUNT NOW CLAIMED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS TRANSPORTATION CHARGES. ACCORDINGLY, UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THERE APPEARS NO LEGAL OBJECTION TO PAYMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR OF THE AMOUNT OF $27.16 CLAIMED FOR DELIVERY OF THE LUMBER AT DESTINATION.
THE VOUCHER IS RETURNED HEREWITH AND PAYMENT OF THE FULL AMOUNT THEREOF MAY BE MADE, IF OTHERWISE CORRECT.