B-133847, APR. 17, 1958
Highlights
FRANCIS MARION COOLEY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO LETTER DATED MARCH 10. YOU ARE ADVISED THAT YOUR CLAIM WILL BE RECONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THE COURT'S DECISION IN THE CASE OF HAROLD ATKINS. WILL BE SETTLED IN DUE COURSE BY OUR CLAIMS DIVISION.
B-133847, APR. 17, 1958
TO MR. FRANCIS MARION COOLEY:
REFERENCE IS MADE TO LETTER DATED MARCH 10, 1958, FROM KING AND KING, YOUR ATTORNEYS, RELATIVE TO OUR DECISION DATED NOVEMBER 18, 1956, B- 133847, TO YOU. THAT DECISION SUSTAINED OUR SETTLEMENT OF AUGUST 12, 1957, WHICH DISALLOWED YOUR CLAIM FOR RETIRED PAY WITHHELD FROM YOU UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 212 OF THE ECONOMY ACT OF 1932, AS AMENDED, 5 U.S.C. 59A.
YOU ARE ADVISED THAT YOUR CLAIM WILL BE RECONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THE COURT'S DECISION IN THE CASE OF HAROLD ATKINS, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, C.CLS. NO. 473-56, DECIDED JANUARY 15, 1958, REAFFIRMING THE PRINCIPLE OF TATO V. UNITED STATES, 136 C.CLS. 651, AND WILL BE SETTLED IN DUE COURSE BY OUR CLAIMS DIVISION.