Skip to main content

Nuclear Weapons Complex: GAO's Views on DOE's Reconfiguration Study

T-RCED-91-8 Published: Feb 25, 1991. Publicly Released: Feb 25, 1991.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the Department of Energy's (DOE) efforts to develop a comprehensive plan to address its nuclear weapons complex's environmental and safety problems. GAO noted that the DOE nuclear weapons complex reconfiguration study: (1) represented the first phase of a long-term effort to develop a more detailed plan and a programmatic environmental impact statement that DOE expected to complete in 1993 on various alternatives for reconfiguring the complex; (2) recommended a smaller complex in the future, but did not specify the dimensions; (3) provided information on four possible complex size scenarios ranging from 15 percent to 70 percent of the fiscal year (FY) 1990 nuclear weapons stockpile; (4) recognized the need to stabilize nuclear weapons requirements and concluded that the Nuclear Weapons Council should specify sizing levels upon which to base the future complex; (5) provided only a limited discussion on how the nation would meet its future tritium requirements and manage its plutonium inventory; and (6) estimated reconfiguration and modernization costs ranging from $6.7 billion to $15.2 billion, but did not include the costs of critical components for the future complex. GAO also noted that such long-standing management issues as reliance on contractors and lack of technical expertise could have a detrimental impact on any reconfiguration of the complex.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Atomic energy defense activitiesCost analysisEnergy researchEnvironmental impact statementsEnvironmental monitoringFacility repairsFuture budget projectionsNuclear reactorsNuclear weapons plant safetyNuclear weapons plants