Legal Opinion Concerning Synopsis Requirements for Certain Types of Automatic Data Processing Equipment and Services Acquisitions

T-OGC-90-3: Nov 16, 1989

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed its August 1989 legal opinion concerning the legality of the General Services Administration's (GSA) establishment of a $50,000 threshold for requiring publication in the Commerce Business Daily (CBD) of orders placed under nonmandatory schedule contracts for automatic data processing (ADP) equipment and services. GAO noted that: (1) statutory provisions required executive agencies to publish CBD notices of ADP services and equipment acquisitions exceeding $25,000; (2) although a statutory provision allowed executive agency heads to waive CBD notice when such notice was inappropriate or unreasonable, the provision did not authorize GSA to establish the $50,000 threshold; (3) executive agencies were not required to publish CBD notices of ADP acquisition orders exceeding $25,000, if they were placed under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts, since such orders were similar to requirements-type contracts; and (4) when used with the term basic ordering agreement, the term similar arrangement referred to the placement of an order that resulted in a new contract, such as the placement of an order under a nonmandatory schedule contract.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here