Skip to main content

Congressional Oversight: The General Accounting Office

T-OCG-95-1 Published: Oct 06, 1994. Publicly Released: Oct 06, 1994.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed its accomplishments and its future direction, focusing on actions it has taken in response to a report by the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) on the roles, mission, and operations of GAO. GAO noted that: (1) although it does not formulate or make policy, GAO is occasionally asked by Congress, and required by statutory mandate, to provide information on policy issues before Congress; (2) it could improve the way it designs and carries out its work; (3) it has begun a number of projects to streamline its business operations as part of the GAO total quality management program; (4) it has an effort underway to better develop GAO work processes and it takes pains to ensure that all GAO products meet standards for fairness, objectivity, and accuracy; (5) it disagrees with the NAPA recommendation that opposes integrating the investigative work of the GAO Office of Special Investigations into routine audits and evaluations; (6) although it tries to obtain agency comments whenever possible, many congressional committees ask GAO not to do so because of the extra time added to the assignments; (7) although it agrees with the NAPA recommendation stressing the need for bipartisan requests for GAO work, there will never be 100-percent bipartisan agreement on GAO work; (8) it has worked to reduce the number of GAO staff detailed to congressional committees; and (9) although it cannot impose a shorter holding time for documents, GAO hopes to improve its ability to predict issuance dates for its reports.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Agency missionsAuditing proceduresAuditing standardsCongressional oversightStaff utilizationInvestigations into federal agenciesStrategic information systems planningTotal quality managementWork measurementAgency evaluations