Superfund:
Further EPA Management Action Is Needed To Reduce Legal Expenses
RCED-94-90: Published: Jan 13, 1994. Publicly Released: Jan 13, 1994.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 512-4907
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) use of Superfund settlement tools, focusing on: (1) how often EPA uses these tools; (2) impediments to their use; and (3) recent EPA actions to increase the use of these tools.
GAO found that: (1) EPA has not fully utilized its settlement tools or encouraged the use of the settlement tools by its field offices; (2) EPA has completed de minimis settlements at 78 sites, prepared nonbinding allocations of responsibility (NBAR) at 5 sites, used mixed-funding arrangements at 16 sites, and used alternative dispute resolutions (ADR) at 35 sites; (3) EPA has focused on getting responsible-party-financed cleanups underway quickly and views the settlement tools as burdensome and difficult to implement because of restrictive administrative procedures; (4) EPA has improved its administrative procedures in response to widespread complaints about high transaction costs; and (5) EPA needs to ensure the long-term use of the settlement tools by assessing the total number of regional sites that are eligible to use the settlement tools, targeting resources to expand the tools' use, setting goals for the use of each tool, and actively promoting the use of each tool among potentially responsible parties (PRP).
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: According to the agency's response, EPA has inventoried all non-federal sites to identify potential candidates for de minimis settlements, and has inventoried "many" sites for use of other settlement tools as part of its Superfund administrative efforts.
Recommendation: To ensure that EPA provides incentives and accountability for the sustained use of the settlement tools, the Administrator, EPA, should inventory NPL sites to identify all candidates for the use of the tools.
Agency Affected: Environmental Protection Agency
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: EPA targets specific funding for use of only one of the tools (ADR), although EPA generally allocates resources to the regions consistent with their targets for the other tools. EPA stated it has not developed SWAT teams per se for all of the tools, but it has designated individuals at headquarters to monitor cases where these tools are being considered or used and provide expert advice to the regions on the process. In addition, EPA has established a team of headquarters personnel to work with the regions in the use of the new allocation process at certain sites.
Recommendation: To ensure that EPA provides incentives and accountability for the sustained use of the settlement tools, the Administrator, EPA, should determine what resources are needed to use the tools and target resources to the regions for their use. EPA could develop headquarters- or region-based SWAT teams to implement the tools and make further use of PRP assistance in supporting the use of the tools.
Agency Affected: Environmental Protection Agency
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: EPA set regional goals for use of de minimis settlements in fiscal year 1994, and has set targets for regional participation in ADR and mixed funding pilots as part of its Superfund administrative improvement efforts.
Recommendation: To ensure that EPA provides incentives and accountability for the sustained use of the settlement tools, the Administrator, EPA, should set goals for each region's use of each tool to ensure the accountability of the region for its use of the tool.
Agency Affected: Environmental Protection Agency
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The Superfund administrative improvements effort entails promotion of settlement tools among PRP.
Recommendation: To ensure that EPA provides incentives and accountability for the sustained use of the settlement tools, the Administrator, EPA, should promote the use of the tools, including NBAR, among PRP.
Agency Affected: Environmental Protection Agency
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Jan 19, 2021
-
Chemical Assessments:
Annual EPA Survey Inconsistent with Leading Practices in Program ManagementGAO-21-156: Published: Dec 18, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 19, 2021.
Jan 15, 2021
-
Environmental Liabilities:
NASA's Reported Financial Liabilities Have Grown, and Several Factors Contribute to Future UncertaintiesGAO-21-205: Published: Jan 15, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 15, 2021.
Jan 13, 2021
-
Nuclear Waste:
Congressional Action Needed to Clarify a Disposal Option at West Valley Site in New YorkGAO-21-115: Published: Jan 13, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 13, 2021.
Jan 7, 2021
-
Hanford Cleanup:
DOE's Efforts to Close Tank Farms Would Benefit from Clearer Legal Authorities and CommunicationGAO-21-73: Published: Jan 7, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 7, 2021.
Dec 18, 2020
-
Drinking Water:
EPA Could Use Available Data to Better Identify Neighborhoods at Risk of Lead ExposureGAO-21-78: Published: Dec 18, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2020. -
Recycling:
Building on Existing Federal Efforts Could Help Address Cross-Cutting ChallengesGAO-21-87: Published: Dec 18, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2020.
Dec 9, 2020
-
Environmental Protection:
Action Needed to Ensure EPA's Enforcement and Compliance Activities Support Its Strategic GoalsGAO-21-82: Published: Dec 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 9, 2020. -
Oil and Gas:
Onshore Competitive and Noncompetitive Lease RevenuesGAO-21-138: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 9, 2020.
Dec 7, 2020
-
Air Pollution:
Opportunities to Better Sustain and Modernize the National Air Quality Monitoring SystemGAO-21-38: Published: Nov 12, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 7, 2020.
Nov 20, 2020
-
Crude Oil Markets:
Effects of the Repeal of the Crude Oil Export BanGAO-21-118: Published: Oct 21, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 20, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here