Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1--An Assessment of Production Alternatives
RCED-84-180: Published: Jul 30, 1984. Publicly Released: Aug 14, 1984.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO addressed geologic, national security, budgetary, and local economic factors that may influence three alternatives to the current oil production approach used for Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1 (NPR-1) beyond 1985. The options include: continued production, shut-in, and partial shut-in. GAO also discussed the advantages and disadvantages of establishing a Defense Petroleum Reserve (DPR) to serve as a crude oil reserve for the military.
GAO found that there are advantages and disadvantages associated with each of the NPR-1 options. Under continued production, NPR-1 could provide more net revenues than under any other option, while avoiding any local economic disruptions. It also could provide a significant source of oil to the Department of Defense (DOD) in a peacetime shortage. With respect to shut-in, NPR-1 would provide substantially less revenues, while adversely affecting the local economy. Further, a shut-in NPR-1 could provide little immediate assistance to DOD in a peacetime shortage. Under a partial shut-in, NPR-1 revenues would be more than a total shut-in, but less than continued production. A partial shut-in would be more advantageous regarding national security than the other options, although it would have some adverse effects on the local economy. GAO did not identify any geological factors that would make one option more attractive than another. GAO believes that a DPR would be a more effective means of ensuring adequate amounts of petroleum products for DOD during peacetime shortages than under any of the NPR-1 options. However, although the DPR plan calls for it to be funded by some of the NPR-1 revenues, it does not specify how this would be done.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Uranium Management:
Actions to Mitigate Risks to Domestic Supply Chain Could Be Better Planned and CoordinatedGAO-21-28: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Dec 8, 2020
-
Offshore Wind Energy:
Planned Projects May Lead to Construction of New Vessels in the U.S., but Industry Has Made Few Decisions amid UncertaintiesGAO-21-153: Published: Dec 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Nuclear Waste Disposal:
Better Planning Needed to Avoid Potential Disruptions at Waste Isolation Pilot PlantGAO-21-48: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 29, 2020
-
Nuclear Safety:
DOE and the Safety Board Should Collaborate to Develop a Written Agreement to Enhance OversightGAO-21-141: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 29, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Plans to Modernize Critical Depleted Uranium Capabilities and Improve Program ManagementGAO-21-16: Published: Oct 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule ConstraintsGAO-20-409: Published: Jul 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Jun 24, 2020
-
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Analyzing Cost Savings Program Could Result in Wider Use and Additional Contractor EfficienciesGAO-20-451: Published: Jun 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 2020.
Jun 9, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Needs to Incorporate Additional Management Controls Over Its Microelectronics ActivitiesGAO-20-357: Published: Jun 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2020.
May 13, 2020
-
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Needs to Better Plan for Post-Cleanup Challenges Facing SitesGAO-20-373: Published: May 13, 2020. Publicly Released: May 13, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Hanford Waste Treatment Plant:
DOE Is Pursuing Pretreatment Alternatives, but Its Strategy Is Unclear While Costs Continue to RiseGAO-20-363: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here