Automobile Fuel Economy:
Potential Effects of Increasing the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards
RCED-00-194: Published: Aug 15, 2000. Publicly Released: Aug 25, 2000.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 512-8024
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) program standards, focusing on: (1) the impact of increasing CAFE standards on oil consumption, the environment, and automobile safety in the United States; and (2) other issues that affect the CAFE discussion.
GAO noted that: (1) according to the studies reviewed and the experts interviewed, raising fuel economy standards would reduce future fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions; (2) however, the impact of raising standards on vehicle safety is less certain; (3) the effect of increasing CAFE standards on vehicle safety is harder to quantify because it depends on many variables, such as the amount of lead time given to manufacturers, the size of the CAFE increase, and the strategies manufacturers use to achieve fuel economy gains; (4) in addition, there is little research linking CAFE increases and vehicle safety; (5) the major concern about safety is that manufacturers might produce smaller, lighter vehicles to meet more stringent CAFE standards and thus sacrifice some level of protection for occupants; (6) GAO found consensus among safety experts and auto manufacturers that as long as there is sufficient lead time to meet higher CAFE levels, auto manufacturers could use fuel-saving technologies instead of simply building smaller, lighter cars, thereby minimizing any negative impact on safety; (7) GAO also identified a number of other issues associated with raising CAFE standards; (8) automobile manufacturers have had little incentive to improve fuel economy because, over the past decade, gas prices have been low and consumers have consistently purchased larger, more powerful vehicles that emphasize performance over fuel economy; (9) the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) new, more stringent tailpipe emission standards may inhibit the use of certain technologies that have great potential for improving fuel economy but may not meet these standards; (10) EPA and the Department of Transportation are concerned that vehicle classification regulations may be outdated, reducing the incentive for manufacturers to increase the fuel economy of their light trucks; (11) it is possible that technology-driven economy increases could occur without increasing CAFE standards; (12) although it is unlikely that such vehicles can be cost-effectively produced and sold in the near future, it is possible that some of the technologies being developed through the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles could lead to improvements in fuel economy without increases in CAFE standards; and (13) finally, some analysts contend that increasing CAFE standards is not as cost-effective as other policy measures for reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, because CAFE standards do not affect older vehicles and may not result in reduced driving.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Uranium Management:
Actions to Mitigate Risks to Domestic Supply Chain Could Be Better Planned and CoordinatedGAO-21-28: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Dec 8, 2020
-
Offshore Wind Energy:
Planned Projects May Lead to Construction of New Vessels in the U.S., but Industry Has Made Few Decisions amid UncertaintiesGAO-21-153: Published: Dec 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Nuclear Waste Disposal:
Better Planning Needed to Avoid Potential Disruptions at Waste Isolation Pilot PlantGAO-21-48: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 29, 2020
-
Nuclear Safety:
DOE and the Safety Board Should Collaborate to Develop a Written Agreement to Enhance OversightGAO-21-141: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 29, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Plans to Modernize Critical Depleted Uranium Capabilities and Improve Program ManagementGAO-21-16: Published: Oct 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule ConstraintsGAO-20-409: Published: Jul 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Jun 24, 2020
-
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Analyzing Cost Savings Program Could Result in Wider Use and Additional Contractor EfficienciesGAO-20-451: Published: Jun 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 2020.
Jun 9, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Needs to Incorporate Additional Management Controls Over Its Microelectronics ActivitiesGAO-20-357: Published: Jun 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2020.
May 13, 2020
-
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Needs to Better Plan for Post-Cleanup Challenges Facing SitesGAO-20-373: Published: May 13, 2020. Publicly Released: May 13, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Hanford Waste Treatment Plant:
DOE Is Pursuing Pretreatment Alternatives, but Its Strategy Is Unclear While Costs Continue to RiseGAO-20-363: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here