The Services Should Improve Their Processes for Determining Requirements for Supplies and Spare Parts
PLRD-82-12: Published: Nov 30, 1981. Publicly Released: Nov 30, 1981.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 275-4141
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
GAO evaluated the validity of the services' requirements determination processes to ascertain whether beneficial techniques used by one service could be applied by other services to best use resources.
GAO found little consistency and coordination among the services on the best way to determine requirements. Thus, techniques developed by one service which seem to have merit and offer potential for doing something a better way are not made available to the other services. Consequently, opportunities to refine and improve the requirements determination process are lost. With better supervision and training, the services could make better use of limited resources and thereby enhance equipment availability and avoid investments in stock levels beyond real needs. GAO selected a statistical sample of items in a buy position during a requirements determination at three locations in the three services and tested the validity of the data elements used in the requirements determination processes. GAO found that the computed requirements were often not based on accurate data. As a result, the requirements were overstated or understated by millions of dollars. GAO noted that the problems could be widespread and significant. The misstated requirements were due to inaccurate data in the automated requirements determination systems, incorrect adjustments to the data, and the failure to follow prescribed leadtime forecasting policies and procedures. GAO found a lack of consistency among the services as to leadtime, first article testing requirements, and forecasting techniques. The data in the services' automated requirements determination systems required extensive manual adjustments to update and correct before a buy decision could be made.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The adequacy of agency actions are being covered under a separate congressional request assignment. Therefore, future followup will be done as a result of that assignment.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should issue guidance to the services which specifically states what constitutes the termination of production leadtime.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The adequacy of agency actions are being covered under a separate congressional request assignment. Therefore, future followup will be done as a result of that assignment.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should issue guidance to the services which specifically states how leadtime requirements for items with a first article testing requirement should be determined.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The adequacy of agency actions are being covered under a separate congressional request assignment. Therefore, future followup will be done as a result of that assignment.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretaries of the Army and Air Force to develop demand and leadtime forecasting techniques which identify and exclude atypical demand and leadtime data and recognize item trends.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The adequacy of agency actions are being covered under a separate congressional request assignment. Therefore, future followup will be done as a result of that assignment.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretaries of the Army and Air Force to develop demand and leadtime forecasting techniques which identify and exclude atypical demand and leadtime data and recognize item trends.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Air Force
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The adequacy of agency actions are being covered under a separate congressional request assignment. Therefore, future followup will be done as a result of that assignment.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretaries of the Army and Air Force to develop demand and leadtime forecasting techniques which identify and exclude atypical demand and leadtime data and recognize item trends.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Army
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The adequacy of agency actions are being covered under a separate congressional request assignment. Therefore, future followup will be done as a result of that assignment.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the service Secretaries to emphasize the need for and provide training to personnel responsible for operating and maintaining the requirements system.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The adequacy of agency actions are being covered under a separate congressional request assignment. Therefore, future followup will be done as a result of that assignment.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the service Secretaries to strengthen the supervision and review process to ensure that the data already in the requirements system and any subsequent adjustments are valid.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: The adequacy of agency actions are being covered under a separate congressional request assignment. Therefore, future followup will be done as a result of that assignment.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the service Secretaries to perform periodic reviews to test the validity of the system data and ensure that the supervision and review processes are strengthened and the responsible personnel obtain a thorough knowledge of the system's operation.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Feb 26, 2021
-
Servicemember Rights:
Mandatory Arbitration Clauses Have Affected Some Employment and Consumer Claims but the Extent of Their Effects is UnknownGAO-21-221: Published: Feb 26, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 26, 2021.
Feb 18, 2021
-
Workplace Safety and Health:
Actions Needed to Improve Reporting of Summary Injury and Illness DataGAO-21-122: Published: Jan 27, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 18, 2021.
Jan 27, 2021
-
Military Spouse Employment:
DOD Should Continue Assessing State Licensing Practices and Increase Awareness of ResourcesGAO-21-193: Published: Jan 27, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 27, 2021.
Oct 19, 2020
-
Fair Labor Standards Act:
Observations on the Effects of the Home Care RuleGAO-21-72: Published: Oct 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 19, 2020.
Jun 22, 2020
-
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act:
Additional DOL Actions Needed to Help States and Employers Address Substance Use DisorderGAO-20-337: Published: May 21, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 22, 2020.
Apr 14, 2020
-
Job Corps:
DOL Should Provide Greater Transparency in Communicating Its Rationale for Closure DecisionsGAO-20-240R: Published: Apr 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Apr 14, 2020.
Feb 14, 2020
-
National Mediation Board:
Additional Actions Needed to Fully Implement Prior GAO Recommendations and Improve Agency Management and OversightGAO-20-236: Published: Feb 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 14, 2020.
Feb 10, 2020
-
National Weather Service:
Information on Contractor Selection and Work Performed for Its Operations and Workforce Analysis ProjectGAO-20-271R: Published: Jan 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 10, 2020.
Sep 9, 2019
-
Job Corps:
Actions Needed to Improve Planning for Center Operation ContractsGAO-19-326: Published: Aug 8, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 9, 2019.
Apr 10, 2019
-
Priority Open Recommendations:
Department of LaborGAO-19-395SP: Published: Apr 3, 2019. Publicly Released: Apr 10, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here