Conventional Arms Control:
Former Warsaw Pact Nations' Treaty Compliance and U.S. Cost Control
NSIAD-94-33: Published: Dec 14, 1993. Publicly Released: Jan 13, 1994.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 512-4128
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
GAO reviewed: (1) the former Warsaw Pact nations' ability to fulfill their obligations under the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE); and (2) U.S. management and costs of implementing the treaty.
GAO found that: (1) the former Warsaw Pact countries have the technical ability to reduce conventional equipment to meet the November 1993 interim deadline; (2) the larger countries have conducted all of the former Warsaw Pact's reductions; (3) some individual countries may not be in full compliance with the treaty because they have not resolved the political problems of accounting for all of the former Soviet Union's treaty obligations, and some countries have failed to follow proper procedures, made incorrect notifications, and have limited resources for CFE implementation; (4) the former Warsaw Pact countries will have to increase their reduction rates to meet 1994 and 1995 deadlines; (5) in general, U.S. agencies have successfully implemented the treaty under a mandate to exercise all treaty rights and meet all possible treaty obligations, but they have incurred significant costs in doing so; (6) minor policy changes could save millions of dollars, but officials do not review implementation policies to determine whether money can be saved while maintaining high compliance and verification standards; and (7) policy officials lack complete data on implementation costs because agencies do not report all CFE-related costs.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: DOD and State do not intend to act on the recommendation. DOD stated that the monitoring functions were already being carried out within the Department and that there was close coordination between relevant organizations. DOD further stated that it did not believe that one financial monitor for the entire U.S. arms control implementation effort would significantly improve the efficiency. GAO does not agree, but because the organizations have no intention of implementing the recommendation, no additional work should be done.
Recommendation: The Secretaries of Defense and State should designate a CFE implementation manager from the Department of Defense to act as a financial monitor and actively participate in the deliberations of the Arms Control Interagency Working Group.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: DOD and State do not intend to act on the recommendation. DOD stated that the monitoring functions were already being carried out within the Department and that there was close coordination between relevant organizations. DOD further stated that it did not believe that one financial monitor for the entire U.S. arms control implementation effort would significantly improve the efficiency. GAO does not agree, but because the organizations have no intention of implementing the recommendation, no additional work should be done.
Recommendation: The Secretaries of Defense and State should designate a CFE implementation manager from the Department of Defense to act as a financial monitor and actively participate in the deliberations of the Arms Control Interagency Working Group.
Agency Affected: Department of State
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: DOD and State do not intend to act on the recommendation. DOD stated that the monitoring functions are already being accomplished within the Department and that there is close coordination among relevant organizations. DOD further stated that it does not believe one financial monitor for the entire U.S. arms control implementation effort will significantly improve the efficiency. GAO does not agree but because the organizations have no intention of implementing the recommendation no additional work should be done.
Recommendation: For each of the other arms control agreements, the Secretaries of Defense and State should consider designating a similar financial monitor from the appropriate lead agency's implementation office.
Agency Affected: Department of State
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: DOD and State do not intend to act on the recommendation. DOD stated that the monitoring functions were already being carried out within the Department and that there was close coordination between relevant organizations. DOD further stated that it did not believe that one financial monitor for the entire U.S. arms control implementation effort would significantly improve the efficiency. GAO does not agree, but because the organizations have no intention of implementing the recommendation, no additional work should be done.
Recommendation: For each of the other arms control agreements, the Secretaries of Defense and State should consider designating a similar financial monitor from the appropriate lead agency's implementation office.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Oct 19, 2020
-
Fair Labor Standards Act:
Observations on the Effects of the Home Care RuleGAO-21-72: Published: Oct 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 19, 2020.
Jun 22, 2020
-
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act:
Additional DOL Actions Needed to Help States and Employers Address Substance Use DisorderGAO-20-337: Published: May 21, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 22, 2020.
Apr 14, 2020
-
Job Corps:
DOL Should Provide Greater Transparency in Communicating Its Rationale for Closure DecisionsGAO-20-240R: Published: Apr 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Apr 14, 2020.
Feb 14, 2020
-
National Mediation Board:
Additional Actions Needed to Fully Implement Prior GAO Recommendations and Improve Agency Management and OversightGAO-20-236: Published: Feb 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 14, 2020.
Feb 10, 2020
-
National Weather Service:
Information on Contractor Selection and Work Performed for Its Operations and Workforce Analysis ProjectGAO-20-271R: Published: Jan 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 10, 2020.
Sep 9, 2019
-
Job Corps:
Actions Needed to Improve Planning for Center Operation ContractsGAO-19-326: Published: Aug 8, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 9, 2019.
Apr 10, 2019
-
Priority Open Recommendations:
Department of LaborGAO-19-395SP: Published: Apr 3, 2019. Publicly Released: Apr 10, 2019.
Apr 9, 2019
-
Military Spouse Employment:
Participation in and Efforts to Promote the My Career Advancement Account ProgramGAO-19-320R: Published: Apr 9, 2019. Publicly Released: Apr 9, 2019.
Apr 8, 2019
-
Workforce Automation:
Better Data Needed to Assess and Plan for Effects of Advanced Technologies on JobsGAO-19-257: Published: Mar 7, 2019. Publicly Released: Apr 8, 2019.
Mar 28, 2019
-
Employment and Training Programs:
Department of Labor Should Assess Efforts to Coordinate Services Across ProgramsGAO-19-200: Published: Mar 28, 2019. Publicly Released: Mar 28, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here