Communities in Fiscal Distress:

State Grant Targeting Provides Limited Help

HRD-90-69: Published: Apr 13, 1990. Publicly Released: Apr 13, 1990.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO assessed whether states were meeting the needs of financially distressed communities in light of the expiration of federal revenue-sharing in 1986, focusing on: (1) the extent to which state assistance programs reduced differences in tax burdens among general purpose local governments; and (2) whether state programs were more effective than federal revenue-sharing programs in reducing tax burden differences between distressed and better-off communities.

GAO found that: (1) between 1977 and 1987, state and federal aid dropped from 40 percent to 31 percent of local revenues, with reductions in state aid accounting for 2 of the 9 percentage point drop, and an overall reduction in federal aid accounting for the rest; (2) due to the decrease in state and federal aid, local governments financed an increased share of their expenditures from local resources; (3) differences between affluent and poorer communities' per-capita incomes widened, suggesting that fiscal disparities between the communities had also increased; (4) the extent of disparities differed across states; (5) in fiscal year 1985, states provided local governments $10.9 billion in general purpose fiscal assistance and federal revenue-sharing provided another $4.6 billion, reducing disparities by approximately 18 percent; and (6) since federal revenue-sharing was more targeted to distressed communities, it reduced disparities more than most state programs.

Jul 18, 2018

Jul 17, 2018

Jul 16, 2018

Jun 28, 2018

May 31, 2018

May 24, 2018

May 10, 2018

Apr 17, 2018

Apr 5, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here