Additional Information about the Scope and Limits of Sanction Data Provided in Recent GAO Report on Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

HEHS-00-133R: Published: Jun 14, 2000. Publicly Released: Jun 14, 2000.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Cynthia Maher Fagnoni
(202) 512-7202
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO followed up on its previous report on the scope and limits of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program's 1998 sanction data, focusing on: (1) whether the number of full-family sanctions in an average month in 1998 can be annualized and used to determine the impact full-family sanctions had that year on caseload size; and (2) what constitutes the combined number of full-family and partial sanctions in an average month during 1998.

GAO noted that: (1) under TANF, full-family sanctions can be imposed, and thus cases can be closed and reopened, multiple times in a year; (2) thus, annualizing the number of full-family sanctions in an average month, while providing an indication of the total number of times full-family sanctions were imposed in a year, would probably overstate the number of families who received full-family sanctions during that year and, thus, the impact of full-family sanctions on caseload size; (3) an unduplicated count of families receiving full-family sanctions could not be derived from the data the states furnished to GAO; (4) developing an unduplicated count of all families whose cases were closed due to full-family sanctions in a given year would require substantial resources; (5) GAO calculated the total number of sanctions in an average month in 1998 by combining the number of full-family sanctions in an average month and the number of partial sanctions in an average month that year; (6) however, in state automated data systems, case closures associated with full-family sanctions are recorded only in the month the action is taken to close the case; (7) in contrast, benefit reductions associated with partial sanctions are recorded by states not only in the month action initiating a benefit reduction is taken, but also in each subsequent month that the benefit reduction remains in effect; and (8) as a result, a family that received a partial sanction in 1998 that remained in effect for 3 months, for example, appeared 3 times in a state's monthly numbers of partially sanctioned cases that year, while a family that received a full-family sanction was counted only in the month the case was closed due to full-family sanction.

Jul 25, 2018

May 30, 2018

Apr 10, 2018

Feb 8, 2018

Nov 9, 2017

Sep 6, 2017

Jul 14, 2017

Jul 13, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here