Skip to main content

Working Capital Fund: HUD Could Improve Management to Better Achieve Efficiencies and Help Ensure Customer Satisfaction

GAO-20-263 Published: Mar 17, 2020. Publicly Released: Mar 17, 2020.
Jump To:

Fast Facts

Federal agencies can save money on services like payroll and travel by consolidating and sharing them with other agencies. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) uses a working capital fund to simplify how it pays for shared services.

The division that administers the fund analyzes HUD’s business processes and recommends ways to use shared services more efficiently. But HUD hasn't assessed how these analyses contribute to the fund’s efficiency goal. Doing so could better position HUD to save more than $1 million annually.

We made 3 recommendations to HUD to help improve working capital fund management.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development sign

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development sign

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

The Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Working Capital Fund (WCF) is a self-sustaining fund that collects fees from HUD customers to pay for services needed across the department. HUD's WCF finances human resource (HR) and financial management related services provided by external federal shared service providers.

HUD defines most roles and responsibilities in its WCF handbook—the primary reference guide for WCF operations—and has established performance metrics. In addition, in response to GAO's review, HUD updated its handbook in February 2020 to include more current and complete information on existing WCF policies and procedures. However:

  • HUD has not defined who is responsible for identifying and implementing opportunities for achieving efficiencies with service usage, including roles for the business process analyses it periodically conducts.
  • HUD has not assessed the results of the business process analyses, or how those results could contribute to supporting efficient service delivery.

Clearly defining WCF roles and assessing the results of its analyses can help HUD better manage the WCF and improve its ability to identify, monitor, and potentially realize cost savings and other efficiencies.

GAO found that HUD has a process designed to equitably and transparently recover the WCF's costs for externally provided federal shared services. Prior to February 2020, it had not fully documented existing policies for managing the WCF's unexpended balances and operating reserves. However, HUD has since established its operating reserve policy that reflects all of the ways that the operating reserve can be used, such as to provide pricing stability to customers and ensure continuity of WCF activities in case of funding disruptions. Written documentation of such policies is essential to ensure that funds are managed appropriately and consistently over time.

Finally, the WCF Committee has not conducted periodic reviews of shared services to help ensure effective management, strong performance, and customer satisfaction. Officials from both business line offices—the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer (OCHCO) and Office of the Chief Financial Officer —stated that they use a variety of mechanisms to obtain customer feedback on services. However, WCF customers in two of three focus groups GAO held said that they have not been given opportunities to provide feedback on the overall quality of services they receive, and some participants shared specific concerns with HR services. Officials from OCHCO—the office that oversees HR services—told GAO they are aware of customer concerns, plan to take additional actions to obtain customer feedback, and acknowledged the need for periodic reviews called for in the WCF Committee Charter.

Until such reviews are conducted to regularly assess customer satisfaction, HUD will likely lack a comprehensive understanding of the extent to which customer needs are being met and could be missing out on opportunities to improve the performance and management of services for which it pays.

Why GAO Did This Study

Moving to shared services is one way agencies can operate more efficiently. WCFs provide a way to centralize and simplify the funding of shared services. HUD's WCF was established in 2016 to provide HUD offices services on a cost-reimbursable basis. The fund currently finances services from external federal shared service providers—the Departments of the Treasury (Treasury) and Agriculture (USDA).

Congress included a provision for GAO to evaluate HUD's WCF. This report examines the extent to which HUD (1) delineated WCF roles and responsibilities and established performance measures, (2) established a transparent and equitable process to recover WCF costs, and (3) developed processes to obtain WCF customer feedback.

GAO analyzed agency documentation of WCF management and financial and budget data, using its work on effective WCF management and unexpended balances as criteria. GAO interviewed HUD, Treasury, and USDA officials and conducted three focus groups with WCF customer offices.

Recommendations

GAO is making three recommendations to HUD on its WCF: define roles for achieving efficiencies; assess results of its analyses; and conduct periodic reviews of business lines. HUD agreed with two and sought additional clarification on one. GAO clarified the recommendation based on further discussion with HUD.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Office of the Secretary for HUD The Secretary of HUD should define and document roles and responsibilities for identifying opportunities to promote more efficient shared service usage through business process analyses, including defining roles for monitoring and implementing actions recommended because of these analyses. (Recommendation 1)
Closed – Implemented
In November 2020, HUD updated its Working Capital Fund (WCF) Handbook to include the WCF Division's role to conduct business process analyses and collaborate with business line owners, such as the Office of the Chief Financial Officer and Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, to identify actionable ways to improve service efficiency and quality. In addition, HUD specified in the handbook that business line owners are responsible for implementing recommended changes, assessing the results of the business process analyses, and reporting results of the assessment to the WCF Division. Now that HUD has clearly defined and documented these roles, it can have reasonable assurance that opportunities to more efficiently and effectively deliver goods and services will be fully and consistently implemented across the department.
Office of the Secretary for HUD The Secretary of HUD, in conjunction with OCFO, should ensure that the results of the WCF Division's business process analyses are assessed to better understand how these analyses contribute to the WCF's established goal to support the efficient delivery of enterprise goods and services. (Recommendation 2)
Open – Partially Addressed
In a letter dated May 19, 2020, HUD's Chief Financial Officer stated that HUD concurred with this recommendation. In November 2020, HUD revised its Working Capital Fund Handbook to specify that Business Line Owners, such as the OCFO and the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, are responsible for assessing the results of business process analyses and reporting results of the assessment to the WCF Division. In December 2020, HUD added a new metric to its performance management scorecard and established a target of assessing the results of business process analyses one year after completion. In 2021, HUD WCF Division completed an analysis of its human resources (HR) business line. In July 2022, HUD officials reported that HUD had taken several actions based on this analysis, such as developing a portal with an overview of the end-to-end classification and hiring processes and a human capital dashboard that shows data on the timeliness of staffing actions. As of December 2022, HUD is also in the process of testing a new system that will include a visualization tool that shows the status of individual actions as they progress through the staffing process and automated forecasting capabilities to assist with long-term staffing resource planning. According to HUD officials, changes will take time to implement, and as of January 2024 the WCF Division's goal is to review the effect of the changes to the HR line of business in fiscal year 2024. When we can confirm that HUD has assessed the results of its ongoing business process analyses, we will provide updated information.
Office of the Secretary for HUD The Secretary of HUD should ensure that the WCF Committee conducts periodic reviews of WCF business lines, as authorized in the WCF Committee Charter, to ensure effective management, strong performance, and customer satisfaction. (Recommendation 3)
Closed – Implemented
In September 2020, HUD initiated a review of its Human Resource (HR) business line, focusing on staffing acquisition and classification services. In March 2021, the Working Capital Fund (WCF) Division completed its review and briefed the WCF Committee on observations and recommendations to improve services for WCF customers. Following completion of the WCF Division's review, the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer (OCHCO) took several actions, including deploying a dashboard to track, analyze, and report on HR metrics such as timeliness of staffing actions. In 2022, the WCF Division also updated its performance scorecard to include a review metric with a target of conducting one service line review each year. In August 2022, the WCF Division provided a briefing to the WCF Committee on the scorecard and actions taken to address the HR business line review recommendations. By conducting a first review of the HR business line and establishing a performance metric to ensure future periodic reviews of WCF business lines, HUD will have a more comprehensive understanding of customers' overall satisfaction and may better identify potential areas for improvement.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Cost savingsHousingWorking capital fundFinancial managementUrban developmentHuman capital managementCustomer satisfactionCost allocationGovernment procurementPerformance measurement