Land and Water Conservation Fund:
Variety of Programs Supported, but Improvements in Data Collection Needed at BLM
GAO-19-346: Published: May 31, 2019. Publicly Released: Jun 20, 2019.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-3841
fennella@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
4 agencies—Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, and Forest Service—use funds from the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) to conserve land or enhance recreational activities.
These agencies used LWCF funds to acquire over 850,000 acres from FYs 2013-2017 for things like protecting wildlife habitat or improving recreational access.
We found that, unlike the other agencies, Bureau of Land Management does not maintain centralized data on how it acquires this land. It also could not identify all lands it acquired with LWCF funds. We recommended that the bureau improve its data collection efforts.
field
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-3841
fennella@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
From fiscal years 2014 through 2018, Congress appropriated nearly $1.9 billion from the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). About half supported federal land acquisition across four agencies—Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service (Park Service) in the Department of the Interior, and the Forest Service in the Department of Agriculture—and half supported five other programs. These five programs provided states or local governments with funds for a variety of conservation and recreation purposes, such as conserving private forests or battlefields.
BLM, FWS, the Park Service, and the Forest Service use similar processes to select federal land acquisition projects involving local land units (such as national parks), regional offices, and headquarters. In general, land units identify projects and send them to regional offices for review before headquarters' offices assess the projects. Conservation organizations can also play a role in assisting federal agencies to acquire lands by identifying willing sellers, among other things.
In fiscal years 2013 through 2017, the four land agencies used LWCF appropriations to acquire over 850,000 acres. Most of these lands were acquired within the boundaries of their land units, according to agency officials. The agencies acquired land for various reasons, such as to protect wildlife habitat or improve recreational access. All four agencies acquired a little more than half of the land on a fee simple basis, which means all rights to the land were obtained; for the remaining land, the agencies acquired less than full ownership of all of the land rights. In addition, these agencies primarily acquired land by purchasing land from a landowner or receiving land donated by a landowner.
GAO found two limitations with BLM's data on land acquisitions.
- BLM does not maintain centralized data on the acquisition methods or land interests for the lands it obtains because such information was not considered necessary when BLM's data system was developed. BLM officials said they are considering including this information in changes to its data system, but they have yet to finalize plans for these changes.
- Some information entered in BLM's data system was not properly coded. Therefore, BLM could not identify all lands acquired with LWCF funds.
In contrast, FWS, the Park Service, and the Forest Service maintain centralized data on acquisition method and interests acquired, which officials from these agencies said were key data elements for maintaining an inventory of the lands they manage and to respond to information requests from Congress. Federal internal control standards call for agencies to obtain relevant data from reliable internal sources. Maintaining centralized data on land acquisition methods and interests acquired would help BLM maintain a more complete inventory of its lands, respond more quickly to information requests from Congress, and provide additional information to manage its lands. In addition, without more specific guidance to ensure that relevant data on LWCF land acquisitions are entered in its data system, BLM will not be able to use its system to identify all of the lands acquired using LWCF funds to track program outcomes and inform management decisions.
Why GAO Did This Study
The LWCF is a U.S. Treasury fund that is used for land conservation and recreational purposes, through land acquisition and other means. The LWCF is authorized to accrue a minimum of $900 million annually, primarily from oil and gas leasing fees. Congress appropriates money from the fund for various programs. Four federal land management agencies—BLM, FWS, the Park Service, and the Forest Service—are responsible for implementing these programs.
GAO was asked to review the LWCF. This report examines (1) LWCF appropriations for fiscal years 2014 through 2018 and the programs supported by these funds; (2) the process for selecting federal land acquisition projects to fund using the LWCF; and (3) the federal lands that were acquired using LWCF funds for fiscal years 2013 through 2017, reasons for acquiring lands, and acquisition methods. GAO reviewed agency guidance; analyzed agency data, including appropriations data, for the most recent data available; and interviewed agency officials at the headquarters, regional, and land unit levels based on geographic diversity and other factors, along with officials at conservation groups identified by federal agencies.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that BLM collect centralized data on the acquisition method and interest acquired for the lands it obtains using the LWCF and that the agency develop more specific guidance to ensure that land acquisition data are entered properly in its data system. Interior concurred with these recommendations.
For more information, contact Anne-Marie Fennell at (202) 512-3841 or fennella@gao.gov.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Open
Comments: The agency concurred with this recommendation. When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of the Interior should direct BLM to collect centralized data on the acquisition method and interest acquired for the lands it obtains using LWCF funds as part of its planned update to Legacy Rehost 2000. (Recommendation 1)
Agency Affected: Department of the Interior
Status: Open
Comments: The agency concurred with this recommendation. When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of the Interior should direct BLM to develop more specific guidance to ensure that land acquisition data are entered correctly into the agency's data system. (Recommendation 2)
Agency Affected: Department of the Interior
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Dec 2, 2019
-
Environmental Protection Agency:
Recent Policy Could Improve Working Relations between EPA's Office of Inspector General and Office of Homeland SecurityGAO-20-89R: Published: Oct 30, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 2, 2019.
Nov 20, 2019
-
Environmental Justice:
Federal Agencies Could Benefit from a Strategic Approach to Assess ProgressGAO-20-290T: Published: Nov 20, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 20, 2019.
Nov 18, 2019
-
Superfund:
EPA Should Take Additional Actions to Manage Risks from Climate ChangeGAO-20-73: Published: Oct 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 18, 2019.
Oct 24, 2019
-
Offshore Oil and Gas:
Opportunities Exist to Better Ensure a Fair Return on Federal ResourcesGAO-19-531: Published: Sep 25, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 24, 2019.
Oct 22, 2019
-
Federal Land Management Agencies:
Additional Actions Needed to Address Facility Security Assessment RequirementsGAO-20-171T: Published: Oct 22, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 22, 2019.
Oct 18, 2019
-
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund:
Limited Information Available on State or Local Requirements That Are Equivalent to Federal Cross-Cutting Environmental RequirementsGAO-20-77R: Published: Oct 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 18, 2019. -
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Would Benefit from Incorporating Risk-Informed Decision-Making into Its Cleanup PolicyGAO-19-339: Published: Sep 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 18, 2019. -
Hardrock Mining:
BLM and Forest Service Hold Billions in Financial Assurances, but More Readily Available Information Could Assist with MonitoringGAO-19-436R: Published: Sep 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 18, 2019.
Oct 16, 2019
-
Environmental Justice:
Federal Efforts Need Better Planning, Coordination, and Methods to Assess ProgressGAO-19-543: Published: Sep 16, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 16, 2019.
Sep 25, 2019
-
Marine Debris:
Interagency Committee Members Are Taking Action, but Additional Steps Could Enhance the Federal ResponseGAO-19-653: Published: Sep 25, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 25, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here