Export Controls:
State and Commerce Should Share Watch List Information If Proposed Rules to Transfer Firearms Are Finalized
GAO-19-307: Published: Mar 1, 2019. Publicly Released: Mar 1, 2019.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-8612
GianopoulosK@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
The State Department reviewed about 69,000 commercial export licenses for firearms, artillery, and ammunition in 2013-17. Proposed changes would transfer export control responsibility to the Commerce Department for many of these items. Different laws and regulations would apply to the items transferring to Commerce.
State and Commerce also use different watch lists to screen potential exporters. Commerce does not have direct access to State's watch list, which contains information from past screenings of export licenses.
We recommended that if the changes are made, State and Commerce should develop a process for sharing State's watch list.
Examples of firearms and ammunition for which export controls may be transferred
Photos of a military-style rifle, a pistol, and a bullet.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-8612
GianopoulosK@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
The Department of State (State) reviewed approximately 69,000 commercial export license applications for firearms, artillery, and ammunition valued at up to $45.4 billion during fiscal years 2013 to 2017. About two-thirds of these applications were for firearms, and the majority involved the export of non-automatic and semi-automatic firearms, which are among the items proposed for transfer from State to Department of Commerce (Commerce) control.
Examples of Firearms and Ammunition Proposed to Transfer from Department of State to Department of Commerce Control
GAO identified several differences in Commerce's and State's export controls including those related to registration, licensing, end-use monitoring, and congressional notification that, according to the agencies, would apply to firearms, artillery, and ammunition proposed for transfer. Some of these differences are due to varying requirements in applicable laws and regulations. For example, the law requires manufacturers, exporters, and brokers to register with State for items controlled by State but not for items controlled by Commerce. Additionally, while Commerce and State both screen parties to licenses against relevant watch lists, Commerce officials said they do not have direct access to State's internal watch list, which contains derogatory information from past screening of licenses for firearms, artillery, and ammunition exports. State and Commerce officials stated that, while they have held some discussions, they have not established a process for sharing watch list information. Without access to State's watch list, Commerce may lack critical information to effectively screen parties to exports of firearms and related items. State and Commerce also both have end-use monitoring programs to confirm the legitimacy of end-users but some differences exist. For example, State relies on embassy staff to conduct end-use monitoring whereas Commerce relies primarily on several officers positioned overseas specifically for this purpose. In addition, a statutory requirement to notify Congress of proposed firearms exports over $1 million would no longer apply to firearms that transfer from State to Commerce, according to Commerce officials.
According to the proposed rules and agency officials, the proposed transfer, if finalized, would result in a decline in licenses and revenues for State and an increase in licenses for Commerce, but the precise extent of these changes is unknown. State estimates that the transfer would result in a decline in revenue from registration fees but officials stated it is difficult to predict the extent of this decline. Commerce officials stated that they expected their licensing and enforcement workload to increase as a result of the transfer, if finalized, but they believe they have sufficient staff resources available to absorb the increase.
Why GAO Did This Study
The U.S. government implements an export control system to manage risks associated with exporting sensitive items while facilitating legitimate trade. State currently controls the export of most firearms, artillery, and ammunition. Regulatory changes proposed by State and Commerce would transfer this responsibility for many of these items to Commerce, which implements export controls under different legal and regulatory authorities. The proposed changes are part of a larger export control reform effort since 2010 to transfer control of less sensitive items from State to Commerce.
GAO was asked to review the proposed changes to export controls of firearms, artillery, and ammunition. This report assesses (1) the volume and value of commercial export license applications State reviewed for these items in fiscal years 2013-2017, (2) how certain export controls differ between State and Commerce, and (3) what is known about the resource implications for State and Commerce due to the proposed transfer. GAO reviewed the proposed rules and related laws and regulations; analyzed data and documents related to licensing, end-use monitoring, and staff resources; and interviewed agency officials.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that if the proposed regulatory changes become final, State and Commerce develop a process for sharing State's internal watch list with Commerce to enhance oversight of firearms, artillery, and ammunition exports. State and Commerce agreed with GAO's recommendations.
For more information, contact Kimberly Gianopoulos at (202) 512-8612 or GianopoulosK@gao.gov.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: State and Commerce published rules in January 2020 which finalized the transfer of certain firearms, artillery, and ammunition. In anticipation of the transfer, in November 2019, State and Commerce signed a Memorandum of Understanding agreeing to share data from their respective watch lists. As a result, State can better ensure that exports of firearms, artillery, and ammunition are used as intended and by legitimate end-users.
Recommendation: If responsibility for controlling the exports of certain firearms, artillery, and ammunition is transferred from State to Commerce, the Secretary of State should ensure that the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs develops a process for sharing State's internal watch list with Commerce to enhance oversight of these items. (Recommendation 1)
Agency Affected: Department of State
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: State and Commerce published rules in January 2020 which finalized the transfer of certain firearms, artillery, and ammunition. In anticipation of the transfer, in November 2019, State and Commerce signed a Memorandum of Understanding agreeing to share data from their respective watch lists. As a result, Commerce can better ensure that exports of firearms, artillery, and ammunition are used as intended and by legitimate end-users.
Recommendation: If responsibility for controlling the exports of certain firearms, artillery, and ammunition is transferred from State to Commerce, the Secretary of Commerce should ensure that the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security develops a process for receiving State's internal watch list and integrating it into Commerce's licensing review process to enhance oversight of these items. (Recommendation 2)
Agency Affected: Department of Commerce
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Feb 8, 2021
-
Venezuela:
Additional Tracking Could Aid Treasury's Efforts to Mitigate Any Adverse Impacts U.S. Sanctions Might Have on Humanitarian AssistanceGAO-21-239: Published: Feb 4, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 8, 2021.
Jan 28, 2021
-
Cyber Diplomacy:
State Should Use Data and Evidence to Justify Its Proposal for a New Bureau of Cyberspace Security and Emerging TechnologiesGAO-21-266R: Published: Jan 28, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 28, 2021.
Jan 27, 2021
-
Afghanistan Reconstruction:
GAO Work since 2002 Shows Systemic Internal Control Weaknesses that Increased the Risk of Waste, Fraud, and AbuseGAO-21-32R: Published: Jan 27, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 27, 2021.
Dec 9, 2020
-
International Trade:
Observations On Whether Women's Rights and Economic Interests Are Protected or Promoted by U.S. Trade Preference ProgramsGAO-21-190: Published: Dec 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 9, 2020.
Dec 2, 2020
-
Foreign Assistance:
USAID Should Analyze Data on the Timeliness of ExpendituresGAO-21-51: Published: Dec 2, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 2, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Global Food Security:
Information on Spending and Types of Assistance Provided by the United States and Other DonorsGAO-21-47R: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Nov 9, 2020
-
Human Trafficking:
Agencies Have Taken Steps to Strengthen International Anti-trafficking ProjectsGAO-21-53: Published: Nov 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 9, 2020. -
Rule of Law Assistance:
State and USAID Could Improve Monitoring EffortsGAO-21-14: Published: Nov 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 9, 2020.
Oct 27, 2020
-
Forced Labor Imports:
DHS Increased Resources and Enforcement Efforts, but Needs to Improve Workforce Planning and MonitoringGAO-21-106: Published: Oct 27, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 27, 2020.
Oct 2, 2020
-
Combating Wildlife Trafficking:
Agencies Work to Address Human Rights Abuse Allegations in Overseas Conservation ProgramsGAO-21-139R: Published: Oct 2, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 2, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here