Healthcare.gov:
Contract Planning and Oversight Practices Were Ineffective Given the Challenges and Risks
GAO-14-824T: Published: Jul 31, 2014. Publicly Released: Jul 30, 2014.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
Contact:
(202) 512-4841
woodsw@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) undertook the development of Healthcare.gov and its related systems without effective planning or oversight practices, despite facing a number of challenges that increased both the level of risk and the need for effective oversight. CMS officials explained that the task of developing a first-of-its-kind federal marketplace was a complex effort with compressed time frames. To be expedient, CMS issued task orders to develop the federally facilitated marketplace (FFM) and federal data services hub (data hub) systems when key technical requirements were unknown, including the number and composition of states to be supported and, importantly, the number of potential enrollees. CMS used cost-reimbursement contracts, which created additional risk because CMS is required to pay the contractor’s allowable costs regardless of whether the system is completed. CMS program staff also adopted an incremental information technology development approach that was new to CMS. Further, CMS did not develop a required acquisition strategy to identify risks and document mitigation strategies and did not use available information, such as quality assurance plans, to monitor performance and inform oversight.
CMS incurred significant cost increases, schedule slips, and delayed system functionality for the FFM and data hub systems due primarily to changing requirements that were exacerbated by oversight gaps. From September 2011 to February 2014, FFM obligations increased from $56 million to more than $209 million. Similarly, data hub obligations increased from $30 million to nearly $85 million. Because of unclear guidance and inconsistent oversight, there was confusion about who had the authority to approve contractor requests to expend funds for additional work. New requirements and changing CMS decisions also led to delays and wasted contractor efforts. Moreover, CMS delayed key governance reviews, moving an assessment of FFM readiness from March to September 2013—just weeks before the launch—and did not receive required approvals. As a result, CMS launched Healthcare.gov without verification that it met performance requirements.
Late in the development process, CMS identified major performance issues with the FFM contractor but took only limited steps to hold the contractor accountable. In April and November 2013, CMS provided written concerns to the contractor about product quality and responsiveness to CMS direction. In September 2013, CMS program officials became so concerned about the contractor’s performance that they moved operations to the FFM contractor’s offices to provide on-site direction. At the time, CMS chose to forego actions, such as withholding the payment of fee, in order to focus on meeting the website launch date. Ultimately, CMS declined to pay about $267,000 in requested fee. This represents about 2 percent of the $12.5 million in fees paid to the FFM contractor. CMS awarded a new contract to another firm for $91 million in January 2014 to continue FFM development. As of June 2014, costs on the contract had increased to over $175 million due to changes such as new requirements and other enhancements, while key FFM capabilities remained unavailable. CMS needs a mitigation plan to address these issues. Unless CMS improves contract management and adheres to a structured governance process, significant risks remain that upcoming open enrollment periods could encounter challenges.
Why GAO Did This Study
This testimony summarizes the information contained in GAO's July 2014 report, entitled Healthcare.gov: Ineffective Planning and Oversight Practices Underscore the Need for Improved Contract Management, GAO-14-694.
For more information, contact William T. Woods at (202) 512-4841 or woodsw@gao.gov.
Dec 3, 2019
-
Bank Secrecy Act:
Examiners Need More Information on How to Assess Banks' Compliance Controls for Money Transmitter AccountsGAO-20-46: Published: Dec 3, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 3, 2019.
Nov 21, 2019
-
Defense Health Care:
Opportunities to Improve Future TRICARE Managed Care Support Contract TransitionsGAO-20-39: Published: Nov 21, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 21, 2019.
Nov 19, 2019
-
Tribal Programs:
Resource Constraints and Management Weaknesses Can Limit Federal Program Delivery to TribesGAO-20-270T: Published: Nov 19, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2019.
Nov 18, 2019
-
Tobacco User Fees:
Further Action Needed to Ensure Calculations Are Based on Complete and Accurate DataGAO-20-34: Published: Oct 17, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 18, 2019.
Nov 14, 2019
-
Nursing Homes:
Better Oversight Needed to Protect Residents from AbuseGAO-20-259T: Published: Nov 14, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 14, 2019. -
Medicare Hospice Care:
Opportunities Exist to Strengthen CMS Oversight of Hospice ProvidersGAO-20-10: Published: Oct 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 14, 2019. -
Generic Drug Development:
Stakeholders' Views of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies DifferGAO-20-94: Published: Oct 15, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 14, 2019.
Nov 12, 2019
-
Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration:
Efforts to Identify Effective Strategies for Low-Income ChildrenGAO-20-30: Published: Oct 11, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 12, 2019. -
Medicaid Providers:
CMS Oversight Should Ensure State Implementation of Screening and Enrollment RequirementsGAO-20-8: Published: Oct 10, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 12, 2019.
Nov 6, 2019
-
Children's Health Insurance Program:
Efforts to Measure and Address Potential Substitution for Private Health InsuranceGAO-20-12: Published: Oct 11, 2019. Publicly Released: Nov 6, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here