The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act:
Revising the Act and Educational Materials Could Clarify Employer Responsibilities and Employee Rights
GAO-03-1003: Published: Sep 19, 2003. Publicly Released: Oct 20, 2003.
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
In 2001, 1.75 million workers lost jobs through extended mass layoffs. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act requires advance notice of plant closures and mass layoffs. The report discusses (1) the extent to which plant closures and mass layoffs were subject to WARN's requirements, (2) the extent to which employers with mass layoffs and plant closures provided notice, and (3) what issues employers and employees face when assessing the applicability of WARN to their circumstances.
About one quarter of the 8,350 plant closures and mass layoffs in 2001 appear subject to WARN's advance notice requirements. Mass layoffs were less likely to be subject to the requirements than plant closures. The difference between mass layoffs and plant closures stems primarily from a rule exempting mass layoffs from WARN's requirements if businesses lay off less than one-third of their workforce (up to 499 workers). Employers provided notice for approximately one-third of layoffs and closures that appear subject to WARN requirements. Specifically, employers provided notices for almost one-half of plant closures, compared with approximately one-quarter of mass layoffs. The remaining mass layoffs and plant closures appear subject to WARN requirements, but notices were not provided. Two-thirds of the notices that employers provided gave the full sixty days' advance notice required by the law. Employers that did not provide notice may be engaging in other practices that limit their liability under the law. In addition, other employers provided notice for mass layoffs and plant closures that were not subject to WARN's requirements as encouraged in the law and the regulations. Employers and employees find WARN's definitions and calculations difficult to apply to their circumstances. Almost all state dislocated worker units reported that employers and/or employees contact them with basic questions on WARN--GAO calculated that states received thousands of communications from employers, employees, and their representatives per year. The courts have interpreted some of the provisions in the law in varying ways, which adds to the confusion and uncertainty when employers and employees apply WARN to their circumstances. Because of this uncertainty, employers, employees, and courts incur costs in time and resources in determining the applicability of WARN to specific circumstances. Finally, the enhanced educational materials being developed by the Department of Labor to address some of these issues have not been made widely available and therefore fail to answer many of the questions asked by employers and employees. This lack of clarity and guidance could ultimately circumvent the purpose of advance notice--namely, to assist dislocated workers in becoming reemployed.
Matter for Congressional Consideration
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: In response to this recommendation, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce has considered amendments to WARN to clarify employer responsibilties and employee rights. They have drafted legislation amending WARN that incorporates these changes.
Matter: To clarify employer responsibilities and employee rights under WARN and to address varying court decisions, the Congress may wish to consider amending WARN by simplifying the calculation of layoff thresholds, clarifying how damages are calculated, defining the term "employer" to address closely related corporations, and establishing a uniform statute of limitations.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The Department of Labor has produced new WARN educational materials-- a brochure addressing workers' concerns and another addressing those of employers. These brochures have been posted on the Employment and Training Administration's web site and are being distributed in both English and Spanish. In addition, the Department has posted the preamble to the WARN regulations on its web site. The preamble provides a detailed commentary on the Department's interpretation of the regulations. Other enhanced educational materials include the WARN elaws Advisor that the Department is currently developing and expects to be completed by mid-2004.
Recommendation: To educate and inform employers and employees about WARN, the Secretary of Labor should take immediate action to make revised educational materials widely available to employers and employees for assistance in understanding the regulations.
Agency Affected: Department of Labor