Are Leaseholders Adequately Exploring for Oil and Gas on Federal Lands
EMD-82-82: Published: Aug 23, 1982. Publicly Released: Aug 23, 1982.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
GAO reviewed the Federal onshore oil and gas leasing system to determine if leaseholders are adequately exploring their leases. Specific issues which were addressed included the extent and nature of activity of the two predominant leaseholders, industry and speculators, and the actions that may be needed to influence their activity.
The Federal onshore oil and gas leasing system has been widely criticized. Problems cited include a large-scale involvement of speculators, lack of requirements for active lease development, a lottery system that encourages abuse, and failure to achieve fair market value for the leases. In the four States reviewed, GAO found that only about 8 percent of the Federal leases were drilled. Industry oil and gas activity has been increasing substantially nationwide, but rig usage has been decreasing in 1982. Industry's drilling activity on Federal lands appears reasonable in relation to activity on non-Federal lands. GAO found that industry may be taking advantage of certain lease extension provisions, but that this is not a significant problem. Many individuals obtain leases, primarily through the lottery system, who may not have the inclination or ability to develop leases. A sample of lottery leases showed that apparent speculators originally held nearly 60 percent of the leases. These speculators prevent the leases from being issued directly to industry and may inhibit efficient development. Eliminating the speculator would not likely have any major adverse effect on development, but it might adversely effect revenues. GAO and the energy industry identified other factors which may delay or inhibit development. The effect on production and revenues of attempts to eliminate the speculator is so uncertain that such attempts should be approached with caution.
Dec 10, 2020
Uranium Management:
Actions to Mitigate Risks to Domestic Supply Chain Could Be Better Planned and CoordinatedGAO-21-28: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Dec 8, 2020
-
Offshore Wind Energy:
Planned Projects May Lead to Construction of New Vessels in the U.S., but Industry Has Made Few Decisions amid UncertaintiesGAO-21-153: Published: Dec 8, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 8, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Nuclear Waste Disposal:
Better Planning Needed to Avoid Potential Disruptions at Waste Isolation Pilot PlantGAO-21-48: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 29, 2020
-
Nuclear Safety:
DOE and the Safety Board Should Collaborate to Develop a Written Agreement to Enhance OversightGAO-21-141: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 29, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Plans to Modernize Critical Depleted Uranium Capabilities and Improve Program ManagementGAO-21-16: Published: Oct 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
Action Needed to Address the W80-4 Warhead Program's Schedule ConstraintsGAO-20-409: Published: Jul 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Jun 24, 2020
-
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Analyzing Cost Savings Program Could Result in Wider Use and Additional Contractor EfficienciesGAO-20-451: Published: Jun 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 2020.
Jun 9, 2020
-
Nuclear Weapons:
NNSA Needs to Incorporate Additional Management Controls Over Its Microelectronics ActivitiesGAO-20-357: Published: Jun 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2020.
May 13, 2020
-
Environmental Liabilities:
DOE Needs to Better Plan for Post-Cleanup Challenges Facing SitesGAO-20-373: Published: May 13, 2020. Publicly Released: May 13, 2020.
May 12, 2020
-
Hanford Waste Treatment Plant:
DOE Is Pursuing Pretreatment Alternatives, but Its Strategy Is Unclear While Costs Continue to RiseGAO-20-363: Published: May 12, 2020. Publicly Released: May 12, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
Explore our Key Issues on Energy
- Air Quality
- Climate Change Funding and Management
- Climate Change Response
- Department of Energy's Contract Management for the National Nuclear Security Administration and Office of Environmental Management - High Risk Issue
- Economic Sanctions
- Electricity Markets, Grid Security and Resilience
- Hardrock Mining on Federal Lands
- Improving Federal Programs that Serve Tribes and Their Members - High Risk Issue
- Limiting the Federal Government's Fiscal Exposure by Better Managing Climate Change Risks - High Risk Issue
- Management of Federal Oil and Gas Resources - High Risk Issue
- Managing Federal Lands and Waters
- Nuclear Energy
- Nuclear Nonproliferation
- Nuclear Waste Disposal
- Nuclear Weapons and Forces Sustainment and Modernization
- Oil, Natural Gas, and Alternative Fuels
- Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Security of Radioactive Materials
- Tribal and Native American Issues
- Understanding Climate Change
- U.S. Arctic Interests
Explore our other Key Issues here
