[Protest of Army Contract Award for Support Services]

B-278689,B-278689.2,B-278689.3: Mar 2, 1998

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for environmental support services, contending that the Army: (1) improperly reevaluated the awardee's proposal as to technical writing and improperly reinstated it into the competitive range; (2) improperly considered both proposals to be tied under the performance risk analysis factor; and (3) improperly failed to follow the solicitation's weighted basis for award scheme. GAO held that: (1) the Army reasonably reevaluated the awardee's proposal; (2) the Army's conclusions were reasonably and consistent with solicitation's evaluation criteria; and (3) the Army's post-protest explanation provided a detailed rationale for its decision, which was reasonable. Accordingly, the protests were denied.

Oct 19, 2018

Oct 17, 2018

Oct 16, 2018

Oct 15, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here