B-278358: Jan 20, 1998

A firm protested an Army contract award for grounds maintenance services, contending that: (1) the Army improperly evaluated its management proposal; (2) the Army's source selection determination was unreasonable; (3) the evaluation of its past performance was improper; (4) its proposal was improperly evaluated with respect to its proposed transportation for its work force; and (5) the award selec...

B-278358: Jan 20, 1998

Agency evaluation of protester's proposal is unobjectionable where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the stated evaluation factors. Under best value solicitation in which technical factors were more important than price. Selection on the basis that awardee's overall technical superiority warranted payment of the associated price premium is unobjectionable and...