B-277063.3:
Jul 6, 1998
A firm protested a Forest Service contract award for bridge repairs, contending that the Forest Service: (1) improperly evaluated its proposals; and (2) conducted an improper best value analysis. GAO held that the Forest Service: (1) properly selected a higher-rated, higher-cost proposal, since the awardee's proposal was evaluated as significantly superior; and (2) reasonably determined that the t...