B-274406:
Dec 9, 1996
A firm protested an Army contract award for food services, contending that the Army: (1) conducted inadequate discussions with the protester; and (2) improperly selected the awardee's slightly higher-priced bid. GAO held that the Army: (1) properly awarded the contract to the high bidder, since it did not believe that the protester's lower price justified the risk of contract nonperformance; (2) w...