B-261089:
Aug 8, 1995
A firm protested a Navy contract award for a switching control system, contending that the awardee's alternate product: (1) would not meet the Navy's minimum needs; and (2) did not satisfy the solicitation's brand name system specifications. GAO held that the Navy reasonably determined that the awardee's product: (1) would satisfy the Navy's needs; and (2) was functionally equivalent to the specif...