[Protest of Army Solicitation]

B-256919: May 5, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army solicitation, contending that the: (1) Army should have included wage and fringe benefit information in the solicitation; and (2) bids received were unreasonably low. GAO held that the: (1) protester untimely filed after bid opening its protest regarding the alleged solicitation deficiencies; and (2) protester's allegation that the bid prices were unreasonably low was not a valid basis for protest. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Oct 20, 2020

Oct 16, 2020

Oct 15, 2020

Oct 14, 2020

Oct 9, 2020

Oct 8, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here