https://www.gao.gov/products/151665

B-255829.3: May 5, 1994

A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest of a Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) solicitation for fiberscopes. GAO had held that the protester: (1) was not sufficiently interested to protest DLA rejection of its alternate product, since it would not in line for award even if its protest were sustained; and (2) untimely filed its protest more than 10 days after initial adverse action o...

https://www.gao.gov/products/401433

B-255829.3: May 5, 1994

DIGEST Decision dismissing protest is affirmed where the protester on reconsideration does not show that decision contained errors of fact or law or present information not previously considered which would warrant reversal or modification of earlier decision. We concluded that Detek was not an interested party to challenge the agency's rejection of its alternate product. The fiberscopes that were...