[Protest of DOE Contract Award for Technical Services]

B-254006.2: Nov 22, 1993

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a Department of Energy (DOE) contract award for technical services, contending that DOE performed an unreasonable cost realism analysis, since it: (1) accepted the direct labor rates proposed by the awardee's subcontractor; and (2) did not calculate the subcontractor's probable indirect costs based upon its proposed ceiling rate. GAO held that DOE reasonably evaluated the subcontractor's: (1) direct labor rates as realistic since the subcontractor based its bid on the current rates it was paying its employees in comparable labor categories; and (2) indirect costs and determined that they best represented the subcontractor's probable cost. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Oct 30, 2020

Oct 29, 2020

Oct 28, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here