[Protest of Navy Contract Award for Roof Replacement and Repair]

B-251533: Apr 7, 1993

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a proposed Navy contract award for roof replacement and repair, contending that: (1) the awardee was ineligible for award, since it did not meet the solicitation's experience requirement; (2) the awardee's predecessor firm's experience was irrelevant, since the awardee did not assume its obligations; and (3) the resumes the awardee provided were not those of its principal officers. GAO held that: (1) the awardee provided sufficient evidence of its experience based on its acquisition of a predecessor firm's assets and employees; (2) the awardee provided the resumes of several current supervisory employees with more than 79 years of combined experience; (3) the predecessor firm's experience was relevant and useful in predicting the awardee's performance; (4) consideration of principal officers was not necessary to determine the awardee's experience, since they may not perform the actual work required; and (5) the Navy reasonably determined that the awardee was responsible, since its experience was equivalent to the solicitation's requirement. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Mar 12, 2018

Mar 9, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here