[Requests for Reconsideration of Protest of Air Force Contract Award]

B-250186.2,B-250186.3,B-250186.4: Jun 2, 1993

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Two firms and the Air Force requested reconsideration of a sustained protest against an Air Force contract award for aircraft engine diffuser cases. GAO had held that the Air Force: (1) erroneously included in the contract additional equipment that it believed it urgently needed; and (2) unreasonably precluded the protester from competition. In its request for reconsideration, the Air Force and awardee contended that the decision should be reversed, since new information showed that the additional units were urgently needed. The Air Force further contended that GAO should modify its recommendation and allow the original contract award to stand, since the awardee was the only qualified bidder. The protester also contended that GAO should modify its decision and direct full or partial award to it. GAO held that it would: (1) not reconsider its decision, since the awardee, protester, and Air Force failed to show any legal or factual errors that would warrant reversal or modification of the original decision; and (2) modify its recommendation, since new information showed that the additional items were urgently needed and the awardee was the only qualified bidder. Accordingly, the original decision was affirmed and the recommendation was modified.

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.
  • Yang Enterprises, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here