[Request for Reconsideration of Protest of Navy Contract Award]

B-246476.3: Jul 22, 1992

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protest against a Navy contract award for research. GAO had held that the protester was not sufficiently interested to challenge the award, since it would not be in line for award even if its protest were sustained. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that the Navy improperly modified a solicitation requirement for the awardee without informing it of the modification. GAO held that the protester failed to prove that the original decision included factual or legal errors that warranted its reversal or modification. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here