[Request for Reconsideration of Protest Against Solicitation for Natural Gas]

B-241031.4: Nov 28, 1990

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm requested further reconsideration of its dismissed protest against a solicitation for the supply of natural gas. GAO had held that the protester was ineligible for award, since it was not a manufacturer or regular dealer. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that it could submit an offer and certify its status as an eligible contractor under Small Business Administration regulations. GAO held that the protester failed to: (1) allege that it qualified as a manufacturer or regular dealer; and (2) present any evidence that warranted reversal or modification of the original decision. Accordingly, the second request for reconsideration was denied.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here