B-239301:
Aug 20, 1990
A firm protested an Army contract award for batteries, contending that the Army: (1) unreasonably awarded the contract to a lower-priced, technically inferior offeror; and (2) violated the solicitation by awarding to an offeror that received a marginal acceptability rating. GAO held that the Army: (1) reasonably awarded the contract to the lower offeror, since it was acceptably competent; and (2)...